Peacock v Peacock

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1984
Year1984
Date1984
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Kelley v Corston
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 July 1997
    ...is any reason to think that there are other relevant circumstances the order may not be made until proper enquiry has been made. In Peacock v Peacock [1991] FCR 121 Thorpe J considered a consent order which had been made in 1982. In the course of his judgment he summarised the principle whi......
  • Chia Hock Hua v Chong Choo Je
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 1 August 1994
  • Arthur J S Hall & Company (Respondent/Plaintiff) v Melvyn Keith Simons
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 December 1998
    ...Co (1995) The Times, 20 December. Palmer v Durnford Ford (a firm) [1992] QB 483, [1992] 2 All ER 122, [1992] 2 WLR 407. Peacock v Peacock[1991] 1 FCR 121. Phosphate Sewage Co Ltd v Molleson (1879) 4 App Cas 801, HL. Pounds v Pounds[1994] 2 FCR 1055, [1994] 4 All ER 777, [1994] 1 WLR 1535, C......
  • Soulsbury v Soulsbury
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 October 2007
    ...event which entitled the court to intervene. The agreement stood accordingly and was enforced. 29 None of these cases were mentioned in Peacock v Peacock [1991] 1 F.L.R. 324, a judgment of Thorpe J., as he then was, to which reference was made in Xydhias. Following the divorce of the partie......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT