Pearl Mill Company v Ivy Tannery Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1919
Date1919

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • André et Cie SA v Marine Transocean Ltd (Splendid Sun)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 April 1981
    ...unhestitatingly hold that it has". 17 ABANDONMENT 18 For myself, I would be prepared to decide this case on the same lines as Pearl Mill Co. v. Ivy Tannery Co. (1919) 1 King's Bench 79. The lapse of time—over eight years—was so long that "the proper inference to be drawn is that each party ......
  • Takashimaya Construction & Development Sdn Bhd& Anor v My Influx Sdn Bhd& Other Appeals
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 April 1987
    ...Rolls, said (at page 700 C): "Abandonment For myself, I would be prepared to decide this case on the same lines as Pearl Mill Co. Ltd. v. Ivy Tannery Co Ltd. (1919) 1 KB 78. The lapse of time—over eight years—was so long that ( per Rowlatt J., at p.82): 'the proper inference to be drawn was......
  • Paal Wilson & Company A/S v Partenreederei Hannah Blumenthal
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 2 December 1982
    ...by B of a situation in which he is estopped from asserting, as against A, that he, B, has not abandoned the contract. Pearl Mill Co. Ltd. v. Ivy Tannery Co. Ltd. [1919] 1 K.B. 78. 91 On whichever of the two bases of abandonment discussed above the sellers seek to reply in the present case, ......
  • Get Started for Free