Penny v Wimbledon Urban District Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1898 |
| Year | 1898 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
29 cases
-
Salsbury v Woodland
...employer is that high; and although the learned judge reinforced himself by certain observations of Lord Justice Romer in Penny V. Wimbledon Urban. District Council (1899 2 Queen's Bench, at page 78), in my opinion the test which he applied was far too stringent. 16 In truth, according to t......
-
Rowe v Herman
... ... That application had succeeded before District Judge Karet on 18th July 1996. Judge Viljoen, however, ... An early illustration of it is to be found in Penny v The Wimbledon Urban District Council [1899] 2 QB 72 ... ...
-
Walsh v Holst & Company Ltd
...a prima facie case against both. 9 So far as the Board is concerned, the law as stated in ( Penny v. Wimbledon Urban District Council 1899, 2 Q.3. at page 78) is applicable: "When a person, through a contractor, does work which from its nature is likely to cause danger to others, there is a......
- Saper v Hungate Builders Ltd
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The site
...physical damage. 465 459 Overton v Freeman (1852) 11 CB 867 at 874, per Cresswell J [138 Er 717 at 720]; Penny v Wimbledon Urban Council [1898] 2 QB 212; Holliday v National Telephone Co [1899] 1 QB 221 at 227–228, per Wills J (reversed on other grounds: [1899] 2 QB 392). 460 Ng Siok Poh v ......