Pensher Security Door Company Ltd v Sunderland City Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Titan Steel Wheels Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [QBD (Comm)]
...Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] 1 CLC 582. Pensher Security Door Co Ltd v Sunderland City CouncilUNK [2000] RPC 249. R & B Customs Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1988] 1 W 321. R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Reg......
-
Titan Steel Wheels Ltd v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
...into in the course of that business.” 67 The third concerned the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 s.23(a). In Pensher Security Door Co v Sunderland City Council(1999) the Court of Appeal was concerned with an alleged secondary infringement of copyright by reason of the purchase of a se......
-
Whitby Specialist Vehicles Ltd v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles Ltd and Others
...121, ZYX Music GmbH v King [1997] 2 AL ER 129, Linpac Mouldings Ltd v Eagleton Direct Export Ltd [1994] FSR 4545 and Pensher Security Door Co Ltd v Sunderland City Council [2000] ROC 249. "Reason for belief" involves the knowledge of facts from which a reasonable person would arrive at the ......
-
FNM Corporation v Drammock
...in LA Gear Inc v Hi-Tec Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, ZYX GmbH v King [1997] EMLR 3419 and Pensher Door Co Ltd v Sunderland County Council [2000] RPC 249. 228 Although the burden of proof is upon the “defendant”, as a practical matter the inquiry will inevitably focus on the reason suggested b......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
REVISITING AUTHORISATION LIABILITY IN COPYRIGHT LAW
...and Lotus Development Corp v Ong Seow Pheng[1996] 2 SLR(R) 514 (HC) at [28]. 18Falcon v Famous Players Film Co[1926] 2 KB 474 at 491. 19[2000] RPC 249 at 277. 20 See also CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada[2004] 1 SCR 339 at [38] where the Canadian Supreme Court adopted the phra......