Penton v Robart

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1801
Date1801
CourtCourt of the King's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • New Zealand Government Property Corporation v HM & S. Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 Diciembre 1981
    ...In my opinion the tenant remains entitled to remove the "tenant's fixtures" so long as he remains in possession. That was decided in Penton v. Robart (1801) 2 East 88. Robart was under-tenant of a yard and buildings at Battlebridge. During his sub-tenancy he erected a wooden shed for the pu......
  • Official Receiver (as liquidator of Allied Cocoa Industries Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) v Chi Man Kwong and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 Febrero 1994
    ... ... In my opinion, the tenant remains entitled to remove the `tenant`s fixtures` so long as he remains in possession. That was decided in Penton v Robart (1801) 2 East 88. Robart was under-tenant of a yard and buildings at Battlebridge. During his sub-tenancy he erected a wooden shed for ... ...
  • Peel Land and Property (ports No.3) Ltd v Ts Sheerness Steel Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 Junio 2013
    ...have held that certain structures and erections which could be called "buildings" were removable tenant's fixtures: see, for example, Penton v Robart (1801) 2 East 88, Mears v Callender [1901] 2 Ch 388 and Webb v Frank Bevis Ltd itself. Conversely, Warrington LJ in Pole-Carew cited Whitehea......
  • Reid v Smith
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT