Percy v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Robert John Clark V. Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow
...decision of the justices that the motor cycle was a motor vehicle in terms of the statutory definition was upheld. [15]In Percy v Smith, 1986 RTR 252 the vehicle concerned was a forklift truck. All the cases to which we have made reference were before the Divisional Court. Again the test en......
-
Clark v HM Advocate
...1 WLR 487 DPP v SaddingtonUNK [2001] RTR 227 MacDonald v CarmichaelSC 1941 JC 27 O'Brien v AndertonUNK [1979] RTR 388 Percy v SmithUNK [1986] RTR 252 Woodward v James Young (Contractors) LtdSC 1958 JC 28 The cause called before the High Court of Justiciary, comprising Lord Marnoch, Lord Abe......
-
The Jockey Club Kau Sai Chau Public Golf Course Ltd v Hksar
...vehicle was in good condition and roadworthy.[23] 76. A further type of relevant evidence would be evidence of user. In Percy v Smith [1986] R.T.R. 252, the Divisional Court held, at p.258H, that the justices were entitled to take into account the actual use made of the vehicle by the defen......
1 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...vehicle” within the 238 Divisional Court defintion in section 190 of the Act of 1972. (Reference may also be made to Percy v. Smith [1986] R.T.R. 252; 51 J.C.L. 239). VEHICLES INTENDED FOR USE ON ROADS Percy v . Smith Yet another case upon the question whether a machine was a motor vehicle ......