Pereira v Pereira
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1901 |
| Date | 1901 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Perrins v Holland and Others
...21 Further the decision in Parker v Felgate was stated to be good law, as one of two grounds for the decision, by the Privy Council in Pereira v Pereira [1901] AC 354. Similarly in Mortimer on Probate 1911 p.70 Harwood v Baker is cited as authority for the proposition that: “If a testator,......
-
Re Glynn, deceased
...of it even if he did not remember in detail the contents of his instructions. Parker v. FelgateELR (1883) 8 P.D. 171; Perera v. PereraELR[1901] A.C. 354 and In re WallaceUNK (1952) 2 T.L.R. 925 approved. 4. That if the deceased was satisfied that the document reflected his instructions and ......
-
Rajaratnam Kumar (alias Rajaratnam Vairamuthu) v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravana Muthu (deceased) and another and another suit
...effect to my intention, and I accept the document which is put before me as carrying it out." In Perera and Others v Perera and Another [1901] AC 354 (“Perera”), the Privy Council endorsed Sir James Hannen’s rule at 362 and regarded it as “good law and good sense”. In Perera, a will was pre......
-
Michele Alexia Canham v Cutty Sark Land Company
...needed to be sufficient to apprehend that the document he was executing was consistent with his earlier instructions: Perera v Perera [1901] AC 354 (PC); Perrin v Holland [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2011] Ch 313 However, the following judicial guidance on the role played by expert medical evide......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...315 Penny v. Bolen, 2008 CanLII 48145 (Ont. S.C.J.) ..................................................... 354 Perera v. Perera, [1901] A.C. 354 ................................................................................ 318 Pesticcio v. Huet (sub nom. Niersmans v. Pesticcio), [2004] EW......
-
Capacity Assessments by the Drafting Lawyer
...testator, at the time he signed his will, is not capable of knowing and approving of its contents. In his conclud-37 Perera v. Perera , [1901] A.C. 354; Kenny v. Wilson (1911), 11 S.R. (N.S.W.) 460; Wilkie v. Wilkie (1915), 17 W.A.L.R. 156; Thomas v. Jones , [1928] P. 162; Battan Singh v. A......