Perks v Perks
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1945 |
| Date | 1945 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 books & journal articles
-
Notes
...of State for the Colonies, February 21, 1946. CO 137/864/11. 54. ‘Not an inch will we yield to the rebels’. Daily Gleaner , February 17, 1946, p.1. and p.8. 55. ‘TUC and PNP gird for action.’ Daily Gleaner , February 18, 1946, p.1. 56. ‘Not attacking but we will defend says Mr Nethersole.’ ......
-
“Whatever It Takes”: Danger, Necessity, and Realism in American Public Policy
...specialists in foreign policy, the distinction between idealist and realist mentalities is familiar (Bull, 2002, pp. 23–26; Carr, 1946, pp. 1–21). An idealist thinks that statecraft can and should be guided by a set of clearly stated and morally defensible principles, and balks at compromis......
-
Moving Beyond the WHO Definition of Health: A New Perspective for an Aging World and the Emerging Era of Value‐Based Care
...of complete physical, mental and social well-being and notmerely the absence of disease or infirmity. (International Health Conference,1946, p. 1)It was visionary in its time, for its focus on well-being across the physical,mental, and social spheres (predating the influential biopsychoso......
-
Problems of the Colorado River as Reflected in Arizona Politics
...an analysis of this treaty, see Martin G. Glaeser, "The Mexican Water Treaty," Journalof Land and Public Utility Economics, Vol. XXII (1946), pp. 1-9 and pp. 352-362. 28 See Malcolm B. Parsons, "Limitations on Continued Colorado River Development in Arizona," 20Rocky Mountain Law Review 280......
Request a trial to view additional results