Philpotts en dem. Philpotts v James and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date22 June 1784
Date22 June 1784
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 99 E.R. 730

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Philpotts en dem. Philpotts
and
James and Others

Distinguished, In re Sheppard [1897], 2 Ch. 67; In re Inman [1903], 1 Ch. 241.

[428] philpotts en dem. philpotts v. james and others. Tuesday, 22d June, 1784. Lease pur autre vie, to T. P. and his heirs, of a rectory, tithes, and premises. T. P. died, living cestui que vie, and by his will devised the premises to M. H. J., his heir-at-law (without saying " his heirs") with a direction to renew the lease. M. H. J. died, devising the premises by a will, attested by two witnesses. Held that the heir-at-law of M. H. J. was entitled to the estate pur autre vie. [Distinguished, In re Sheppard [1897], 2 Ch. 67 ; In re Inman [1903], 1 Ch. 241.] This ejectment was tried at the last Hereford Assizes, and a case reserved which stated that, by indenture of 30th October, 1746, between T. Payne, Archdeacon of Brecon, and landlord of the rectory of Llandew, and Thomas James, eldest son and heir of Meredith James, reciting a former lease from T. Payne to Meredith James, the said Thomas Payne, in consideration of the surrender of the said lease and of 30, did demise, grant, and to farm let, unto the said Thomas James all that the aforesaid rectory of Llandew, and all and singular the tithes and premises aforesaid with the appurtenants, in as large and ample a manner as any former tenant formerly held and enjoyed the said premises. To hold to the said Thomas James, his heirs and assigns, from the making thereof, for and during the natural lives of the said Thomas James, W. Morgan, and Charles Evans, at a rent of 10. The premises demised by the said lease, and in question in this cause, consist of the churchyard of Llandew, about twelve acres of glebe, and all the great and small tithes of the said rectory. W. Morgan, one of the lives mentioned in the lease, is still living. Thomas James died in 1769, having made his will, duly executed, whereby, after devising the bulk of his estate to his nephew, Meredith Herbert James, who was his heir-at-law in strict settlement, and a part of it to him in fee, he devised as follows : " Also I give to my said nephew, Meredith, all and singular my freehold lease of the rectory and tithes of Llandew, granted to me by T. Payne, late Archdeacon of Brecon, for the term of three lives, who are all now living, whereof my own life is one; and it is my will and desire, and I do hereby recommend it to ray said nephew, Meredith...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Horan v Horan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 25 July 1935
    ...at p. 228, the following MS. note, in his own hand-writing: —"The case before Ld. Mansfield here referred to has been since printed in 3 Doug, 425, viz., Philpotts, d.,Philpotts v. James. It was sent to one of the counsel inBlake v. Blake, and when I stated this in arguing a case of Wall v.......
  • Earl of Mountcashell v More-Smyth
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 27 June 1894
    ...C. 297. Philips v. PhilipsENRENR 1 Vern. 430; 1 P. Wms. 34. Philips v. PhilipsENRENR 2 Vern. 430; 1 P. Wms. 34. Philpotts v. PhilpottsENR 3 Doug. 425. Pierson v. ShoreENR 1 Atk. 479. Reynolds v. WrightENR 2 De G. F. & J. 590. Ripley v. Waterworth 7 Ves. 437. Steed v. PreeceELR L. R. 18 Eq. ......
  • Re King, Deceased. King v King
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 2 June 1898
    ...LewisENR 9 M. & W. 662. More-Smyth v. MountcashellENR 9 M. & W. 662. Mountcashell v. More-SmythELR [1896] A. C. 158. Philpotts v. JamesENR 3 Doug. 425. Sheppard v. ManningELR [1897] 2 Ch. 67. Wall v. ByrneENR 2 Jo. & Lat. 118. Estate pur autre vie — Devolution of estate — Special occupant —......
  • Took v Glascock
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1845
    ...to A. B. and " his assigns," the personal representatives of the devisee would have been entitled. 9 M. & W. 662, Doe v. Lewis. (But see 3 Dougl. 425, PhilpaUs v. Jajnes.) And it should seem that in the case of a will made after the year 1837, the whole term itself would pass to the devisee......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT