Phipps & Company v Rogers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1925 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Thomas v Crampad International Marketing Company Ltd et Al
...from the 24th November 1981 plus one month of tenancy which would take first named plaintiff to the end of June. ( Phipps v. Rogers [1925] 1 K.B. 14, 27] – ‘Although no particular form need be followed there must be plain unambiguous words claiming to determine the existing tenancy at a cer......
-
Mannai Investment Company Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Company Ltd
...was made clear by another distinguished lawyer, Atkin L.J., in P. Phipps and Co. (Northampton and Towcester Breweries) Ltd. v. Rogers [1925] 1 K.B. 14, 27. He there cited Lord Coleridge C.J. as saying in Gardner v. Ingram (1889) 61 L.T. 729, 730, that: "Although no particular form need be ......
-
Mannai Investment Co. v. Eagle Star Life Assurance Co., (1997) 215 N.R. 321 (HL)
...to. [paras. 5, 28, 46, 58]. Hankey v. Clavering, [1942] 2 K.B. 326, not folld. [paras. 7, 28, 46, 58, 92]. Phipps and Co. v. Rogers, [1925] 1 K.B. 14, refd to. [para. Gardner v. Ingram (1889), 61 L.T. 729, refd to. [para. 12]. Doe d. Cox v. Roe (1802), 4 Esp. 185, refd to. [paras. 14, 65]. ......
- Asp Holdings Ltd v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results