Phonographic Performance Ltd v AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date18 June 1997
Date18 June 1997
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • BSkyB Ltd and Another v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd and Another (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 28 June 2010
    ...following guidance can be derived from previous decisions in relation to proportionate costs orders. 10 Lord Woolf set out in Phonographic Performance Ltd v AEI [1999] 1 WLR 1507 at 1523 that: “The most significant change of emphasis of the new Rules is to require courts to be more ready to......
  • Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 29 September 2008
    ...order under paragraph 6(f), it must instead, if practicable, make an order under paragraph 6(a) or (c)”. 21 In AEI Rediffusion Music Limited v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507 at 1522 to 1523 Lord Woolf MR made the following comments on Part 44 of the CPR, which was then a......
  • HM Revenue and Customs v Cassells
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 4 December 2008
    ...are limited. They are set out in a number of places, but I will take the citation to which I was referred from AEI Rediffusion Music Limited v. Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 2 1 WLR 1507 at page 1523 from the judgment of Lord Woolf M.R: “It was correctly accepted by the judge that......
  • Steven Anthony Burns and and Another v Colin Leslie Burns
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 January 2016
    ...various factors adequately in the scale: see Assicuzione Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group [2003] 1 WLR 577 and Phonographic Performance Ltd. v AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd. [1999] 1 WLR 1507, 1523 per Lord Woolf MR. 39 As to the law, Mr Fryer-Spedding argued that the judge failed adequately......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT