Pickup v Thames Insurance Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 16 May 1878 |
Date | 16 May 1878 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
- Silver Corridor Sdn Bhd v Gallant Acres Sdn Bhd
-
IMM v The Queen
...JJ agreeing at 719 [103]). 104 There are, however, rare examples of earlier usage of the phrase. See, eg, Pickup v Thames Insurance Co (1878) 3 QBD 594 at 598; Muse v Arlington Hotel Co 68 F 637 at 645 (1895); Golden Reward Min Co v Buxton Min Co 97 F 413 at 417 (8th Cir 1899); In re Joseph......
- Houghton v Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Company Ltd (Ny-Eeasteyr)
-
Ashworth v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation
...p. 455. (7) 2 App. Cas. 284. (8) [1920] 1 K. B. 447; [1921] A. C. 615. (1) [1924] P. 208. (2) [1920] 1 K. B. 447; [1921] A. C. 615. (3) 3 Q. B. D. 594. (1) [1918] A. C. (2) [1949] A. C. 196. (3) [1940] A. C. 997. (4) [1920] A. C. 956. (1) [1918] A. C. 350. (2) [1922] A. C. 129. (3) 25 Q. B.......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Pirates... A Charterers' Peril of the Sea?
...Ltd (The Hongkong Fir) [1962] 2 QB 26, [1961] 2 Lloyd‟s Rep 478 (CA) 106Pickup v Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Co Ltd (1877-78) LR 3 QBD 594 (CA) 107Ajum Goolan Hossen & Co v Union Marine Insurance Co Ltd [1901] AC 362 (PC) 108Fiumana Societa di Navigazione v Bunge & Co Ltd [1930] 2 KB......
-
Cases referred to in 1989 Part II
...150 Pickup v. Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance 3 Q.B.D. 594. ................................ 149 Pius Amakor v. Benedict Obiefuna (1974) 3 S.C. 75, 76. .......................................... 379 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1989 PART H Practice Note (1961) 1 All E.R. 319, (1961) 1 W.L.R. 257. ......
-
BURDEN OF PROOF ON PLEADINGS
...concept of burden of proof on the pleadings has an ancient ancestry, Pickup v. Thames Ins. Co 3 Q.B.D. 594, 600; and Wakelin v. L&S. W. Railway 12 App Cas. 41, 45. Its contemporary affirmation can be found in such popular cases like Joseph Constantine Steamship Line Ltd. v. Imperial Sme......