Piercy v Mills & Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1920 |
Year | 1920 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
- Dr Mahesan a/l Subramaniam v Ponnusamy a/l P Rajoo
-
Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd
... ... SAME v. SAME ... [1963 H. No. 1789] ... 1963 Oct. 8, ... BUCKLEY J ... Company - Director - Fiduciary duty to company - Use of powers to issue shares and lend money in order to ... Punt v. Symons & Co. Ltd. [ 1903 ] 2 Ch. 506 and Piercy v. S. Mills & Co. Ltd. [ 1920 ] 1 Ch. 77 ; 35 T.L.R. 703 applied ... (3) That the ... ...
- Soo Boon Siong v Saw Fatt Seong
- Zung Zang Wood Products Sdn Bhd v Kwan Chee Hang Sdn Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
A ‘fair and reasonable proposal’ by the board may still amount to a breach of duty to exercise directors’ powers for a proper purpose
...Viscount Finlay confirmed the centrality of the ‘motive’ element in Hindle v John Cotton Ltd26 when 20 Ibid.21 [1903] 2 Ch. 506.22 [1920] 1 Ch. 77 at 84.23 (1864) 2 H & M 10.24 [2015] UKSC 71.25 Ibid para 43.26 (1919) 56 Sc LR 625. © Juta and Company (Pty) 35A ‘FAIR AND REASONABLE PROPOSAL’......