Pigot's Case; Winchcombe v Pigot
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1614 |
| Date | 1614 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Bank of Scotland Plc v Greville Development Company (Midlands) Ltd and Others
...by representing that all parties were agreed that the Deed should have referred to both titles, and (c) in consequence, applying the rule in Pigot'sCase (1614) 11 Co.Rep. 26b, the Deed was void as and from the date when it was altered, or, in any event, (d) the power to alter under LRR, Rul......
-
Bank of Scotland Plc v Greville Development Company (Midlands) Ltd and Others
...under rule 130 of the Land Registration Rules 2003 so as to include a charge over 916. Mr Blundell has always maintained that the rule in Pigot'sCase [1614] 11 Co Rep 26 means and meant that the deed was void as from the date of alteration because of the amendment. 7 To cut a long story sho......
-
Goss v Chilcott
... ... 183B , 186C–F ) ... Pigot's Case ( 1614 ) 11 Co.Rep. 26b applied ... But (2), dismissing ... ...
-
Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG v Crossseas Shipping Ltd
... ... Pigot's CaseENRENR (1614) 11 Co Rep 26b; 77 ER 1177 ... a material alteration which avoided the guarantee relying on Pigot's Case (1614) 11 Co Rep 26b. On a trial of preliminary issues Cresswell J held ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results