Pillar v Provincial Court of Klagenfurt, Austria
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 3180 (Fam) |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Re N (A Child) (Payments for Benefit of Child)
...Trusts, Re, Younghusband v Coutts & Co [1963] 3 All ER 1, [1964] Ch 303, [1963] 3 WLR 742, CA. Phillips v Peace[1996] 2 FCR 237, [2005] 2 All ER 752, [1996] 2 FLR R (Child), Re (21 October 1999, unreported), CA. S (Unmarried Parents: Financial Provisions), Re[2006] EWCA Civ 479, [2006] 2 FL......
-
Green v Adams
...2 All ER 515, [1977] Fam 122, [1977] 2 WLR 712. N v N [1928] All ER Rep 462, (1928) 44 TLR 324. Phillips v Peace[1996] 2 FCR 237, [2005] 2 All ER 752, [1996] 2 FLR SR v CR (ancillary relief: family trusts) [2008] EWHC 2329 (Fam), [2009] 2 FLR 1083, [2009] 2 FCR 69. Vaughan v Vaughan [2007] ......
-
DN v UD
...lump sum be used to circumvent the prohibition on there being more than one settlement or transfer of property order: Phillips v Peace [2005] 2 FLR 1212 at paragraph 35 per Singer J: [35] It would, in my view, be just as much a misuse of the court's power were M enabled by claiming a lump s......
-
CF v KM
...impact generally of there being such a power in Schedule 1 cases, and having regard to the approaches referred to in Phillips v Peace [2005] 2 FLR 1212 and taken under the MCA 1973 in Wicks v Wicks [1998] 1 FLR 470. 19 An argument was also advanced that, if the court had jurisdiction to mak......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Financial Provision For Children Born Out Of Wedlock
...satisfy such need once and for all. The Court of Appeal, having considered the Judgment of Singer J in the case of Phillips v. Peace [2005] 2 FLR 1212, went further and decided that since a lump sum order is to be paid once and for all, it is therefore not appropriate if the intention is to......