Pindos Shipping Corporation v Raven (Mata Hari)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes v Viridor (Community Recycling MK) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 22 February 2017
    ...in principle. However, even if it were right, it has not been made out on the facts. 62 Mr Davie QC relied on Pindos Shipping Corporation v Fredrick Charles Raven ("The Mata Hari") [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 449 in support of the proposition that, if the executed contract did not merely record an......
  • Dunlop Haywards DHL Ltd v Barbon Insurance Group Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 April 2009
    ...the claimant to prove that the prior common intention survived into the later contract. An example of such a case is Pindos Shipping Corporation v. Raven (The Mata Hari) [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 449 where Bingham J had to consider a claim to rectify an insurance policy together with its slip on......
  • Dunlop Haywards DHL Ltd v Barbon Insurance Group Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 19 November 2009
    ...were put down by the Excess Insurers. 51 A somewhat similar situation arose in Pindos Shipping Corporation v Frederick Charles Raven [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 449. There, a claim was made under a policy of marine insurance in respect of the yacht Mata Hari which sank at her moorings during a sto......
  • Ted Baker Plc and Another v AXA Insurance UK Plc and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 25 May 2012
    ...Low & Co v Vigors (1887) 12 App Cas 531, 542; SAIL v Farex [1995] LRIR 116, Stanton & Stanton v Starr (1920) 3 11 L. Rep 259; Pindos v Raven ("The Mata Hari") (1983) 2 Lloyd's Rep 449; and Kemp v Neptune Concrete 1989 57 P. CR 369. The resolution of that debate would, or at least might have......
1 books & journal articles
  • The Policy-Slip (Dis)connect
    • United Kingdom
    • Southampton Student Law Review No. 1-2, July 2011
    • 1 July 2011
    ...(1871) LR 6 QB 674; affirmed on appeal (1872) LR 7 QB 517; Pindos Shipping Corporation v. Frederick Charles Raven (The “Mata Hari”) [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 449. 3Bennett, HN, The Law of Marine Insurance 2nd ed (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006) [3.68] 4But see General Reinsurance Corporat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT