Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Pinnock Brothers v Lewis & Peat

The Law Reports Cited in 52 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1923
Date1923
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
43 cases
  • Hill (Christopher) Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd (Description)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 July 1969
    ...173 We find nothing inconsistent with our conclusion in the authorities cited to us. The learned judge referred to three cases: Pinnock Bros. v. Lewis & Peat Ltd. (1923) 1 King's Bench 690; British Oil and Cake Co. Ltd. v. J. Burnstall & Co. Ltd. (1923) 15 Lloyd's List Reports 46; and Rober......
  • Hill (Christopher) Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd (Description)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 February 1971
    ...of the goods is that with which the section is concerned. The defendants rely on the oft quoted decision of Roche J. in Pinnock Bros. v. Lewis & Peat [1923] 1 K.B. 690. This related to the sale of East African copra cake. The Goods were so adulterated with castor seed as to be poisonous to......
  • Metalfer Corporation v Pan Ocean Shipping Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 7 October 1997
    ...TLR 206. Ion, The [1971] 1 Ll Rep 541. Metalimex Foreign Trade Corp v Eugenie Maritime Co LtdUNK[1962] 1 Ll Rep 378. Pinnock Brothers v Lewis & Peat LtdELR[1923] 1 KB 690. Pompe v Fuchs(1876) 34 LT Sabah Flour and Feedmills Sdn Bhd v Comfez LtdUNK[1988] 2 Ll Rep 18. Smeaton Hanscomb v Sasoo......
  • Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 20 December 1965
    ...on the facts of this case the clause does not exempt the sellers from liability and would add only two observations. 137 In Finnock Brothers v. Lewis & Peat Limited, (1923) 1 K. B. 690, Mr. Justice Roche, in a case where a consignment of copra cake contained such an admixture of castor bea......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, January 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...& Co (1899) 16 TLR 55 ('Scott'). See also Becker v Medd (1897) 13 TLR 313. (113) See, eg, Pinnock Brothers v Lewis & Peat Ltd [1923] 1 KB 690, 698 (Roche J); GC Dobell & Co Ltd v Barber [1931] 1 KB 219 (statutory warranty); Cammell Laird & Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze & Bra......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT