Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1980 |
| Year | 1980 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Indian Overseas Bank v Cheng Lai Geok
...Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221 (refd) McKenna v Richey [1950] VLR 360 (folld) Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton (1982) 43 P & CR 415 (folld) Pollway Ltd v Abdullah [1974] 1 WLR 493; [1974] 2 All ER 381 (distd) Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex 850 (refd) Stirrup's Contract......
-
Tate and Another v Sihan Sadikan
...the date fixed for completion can rescind the contract the moment he can establish that fact. (See Pips (Leisure Productions) v Walton [1982] 43 P & CR 415 ) The conclusionIn this case the plaintiffs do not seek rescission based on deficiency in the subject matter described in the contract.......
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Saktu & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
... ... Walton J said at p 78: ... The notice of 23 June 1972 limited a period of ... ...
-
Implementation Ltd v Social Development Commission; Social Development Commission v Implementation Ltd
...This is so even if consent could not properly be withheld. See VC Robert Megarry's judgment in Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton [1981] 2 EGLR 172 which approved and applied the rule in Forrer v Nash in holding, on the facts in that case, that lack of title is an answer to a claim for......
Get Started for Free