Pitcher v Martin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Year1937
Date1937

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Gibb v Comerford
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1942
    ...damage). Heath's Garage Ltd. v. HodgesELR [1916] 2 K. B. 370, followed; Deen v. DaviesELR [1935] 2 K. B. 282, and Pitcher v. MartinUNK[1937] 3 All E. R. 918, distinguished. A dog, alleged to be the property of the defendant, ran from the defendant's front garden across a suburban highway an......
  • Gomberg v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 22 January 1962
    ...Gayler & Pope v. Davies. 1924 2 King's Bench, 75, and the dictum of Lord Porter in Searle v. Wallbank, 1947 Appeal Cases at 356. 12 In Pitcher v. Martin, 1937 3 All England Reports, 918, the Defendant on a highway held her dog's lead soloosely that the dog broke loose and the lead became ......
  • Jackson Ivan O"neil Amrol v Marisol Rivera
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 19 March 2008
    ...in that area is, in my view, most negligent. She is therefore liable. 59. The Plaintiff’s counsel has also relied on Pitcher v Martin [1937] 3 All ER 918 and submitted that the Defendant is liable on nuisance. In the case cited, the owner was held liable for the nuisance created by allowing......