Piyaratana Unnanse v Wahareke Sonuttara Unnanse, decd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438
...launch an appeal.[36] The classic statement of the doctrine is in Piyaratana Unnanse v. Wahareke Sonuttara Unnanse, [1950] 2 W.W.R. 796, [1950] A.C. 561 (P.C.), where the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council wrote, at 800:The general rule is clear that once an order is passed and entered......
-
Western Caissons Ltd. v. Zurich Insurance Co., (1993) 137 A.R. 377 (QB)
...5250 Trials - Consolidation of actions - General - [See Courts - Topic 2181 ]. Cases Noticed: Unnanse v. Unnanse, [1950] 2 W.W.R. 796; [1950] A.C. 561, refd to. [para. Millar v. Millar (1991), 116 A.R. 186; 81 Alta. L.R.(2d) 160 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 7]. Pelican Spruce Mills Ltd. v. Pelic......
-
Holeksa (Guy) Law Corp. v. Ron's Backhoe Ltd., [2005] B.C.T.C. Uned. 488 (SC Reg.)
...submissions, Mr. McLeod relied on a number of authorities. Firstly, he referred me to Piyaranta Unnase v. Wahareke Sonuttara Unnase , [1950] A.C. 561 (Privy Council), in which decision it was held, at p. 567: The general rule is clear that, once an order is passed and entered or otherwise p......
-
Kokanee Mortgage MIC Ltd. v. Couiyk et al., [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. G05
...103. In that case, MacDonald L.J.S.C. (as he then was) quoted with approval from Piyaratana Unnanse v. Wahareke Sonuttara Unnanse [1950] A.C. 561, [1950] 2 W.W.R. 796 (P.C.), a decision of the Privy Council, where Sir John Beaumont stated at p.800: "The general rule is clear that once ......
2 books & journal articles
-
BOLA V. LATUNDE; OGUNPA V. ST. JAMES CHURCH
...to dispense with a motion to correct the order, a separate motion was required. 20 CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT. 1. Unnanse v. Unnanse (1950) A.C. 561. 2. Hatton v. Harris (1892) A.C. 547. Kotun, K.A. for the applicants (appellants). 25 Orojo for the respondents. BRETT, F.J.: This matter a......
-
TOWN CLERK, L.T.C. V. CLEMENT
...court has inherent jurisdiction to en 5 sure that its order carries into effect the decision at which it arrived: Unnanse v. Unnanse (1950) A.C. 561; and if necessary Order 28 rule 11 of the Rules of the Supreme Court in England might be invoked by virtue of Order 7 rule 36 of the Federal S......