Pluis de Gammons Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1657
Date01 January 1657
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 125

COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER

Pluis de Gammons Case

[39] pluis de gammons case, supra, Pascb. 41. Pluis de Gammons Case. Henden. Scire facias ne gist sur ceat record. Jeo agree que un accon de debt bien gist; Car nul president poet ee raonstre que Judgment done in iuferiour Court poet ee execute icy. Car primo, cest Court ne serra fait un Instrument al exeeuter Judgment done in auter Court: voier est que Attaint giser icy de faux verdict done in Supariour Court, come il prisfc le ease in 14 H. 4. 10. Issint ai issue soit joine in Inferiour Court sans Cuatome, il ne serra remove per Certiorari dee trie icy, Issint est in nostre case. Second. Lestatutes que done eux poiar, scil. 26 H. 8. 34 H. 8. fait le matter cleere, come, 10 Eliz. Dyer. Error in Aaaise devant lea Justices de Aasise ne voet giser in cest Court. Car Judges itinerant sont auperiour (2.) Ceux Judges sont appoint per Act de Parlament. Et iaaint les Judges icy in Wales aont per Act de Parlament, & ount poiar a Oyer & Terrainer : Et jeo ne trove que aprea Judgment Certiorari avoit estre, a ramover un Record hors de Inferiour Court. Et le mischief serroit, si Judgment serroit done pur 201. il aerroit Executory per tout le Realm, ou ils ount forsque special Jurisdiction, & auxi le tenor de Record eat solement remove, & execution ne poet ee hor* del tanor del Record, Dyer, 369. pi. 52. 126 TEIN. 3 CAR. IN COMMUNI BANCO LITTLBTON, . Richardson. Le question est quant la record eat remove icy, si serroit idle. Si Judgment soit done in Inferiour Court, que tient plea per prescription ou per grant, & remove per breve de error, ai le Judgment soft affirms icy, nous poiomus agarder eaecucon 16 Jac. fuit express president de Judgment in inferior Court, et scire facias grant icy, & auxi le scire faciaa est grant in lieu de accon de debt. Car per Common lej aprea le ami il ne poet aver fieri facias, mes fuit raise al accon de debt. Et per common ley debt gist in cest case. Et Harvey accord. Crook. Cest...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Judith Garrard, Widow Demandant, Tuck, Tenant
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 25 June 1849
    ...claim; or she may recover on the trial, although she may fail in proof as to part: Williams v. Gwyn (2 Wms. Saund. 44 a. and the notes); Littleton, 39; Co. Litt. 34 b., 281. [Maule, J. The question is, whether it was not necessary for the tenant to plead the term as to so much, and ne unque......
  • Goodwin v Parker. in C. B
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1826
    ...criminal cases, vid. Buller, N. P. 316. Willes, 535. 1 Phil. Evid. 304, 305, 4th ed. 3 Evans' Coll. Stat. 341, 342, notes, 2d edit. (2) Go. Litt. 39 a. 1 Stra. 540, 543. (3) See same book, p. 215, 248, ed. 1768. (4) Post, c. 230, & note, ibid. (e) That no writ of error lies on summary proce......
  • Venezia v. King, [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 6453 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 November 2010
    ...defendants, jointly and severally between them, to reimburse the plaintiff for the expenses and costs of this action, in a total amount of Lit. 39,834,000, including Lit. 2,500,000 as costs, Lit. 9,334,000 for fees due to the proxy and Lit. 28,000,000 for legal fees, in addition to the reim......
  • Parker v Carter
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1845
    ...to those cases at law, in which actual entry has been dispensed with, where the lands were in the possession of a tenant for years. (Co. Lit. 39 a.) But I am satisfied the argument in favour of the courtesy cannot be supported merely by the existence of the term, as distinguished from the r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Appendix - Desk Book
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas DTPA Forms & Practice
    • 31 March 2016
    ...Co. 63, 75 Walden v. Jeffery 48 W.O. Bankston Nissan, Inc. v. Walters 75 Weitzel v. Barnes 47, 52, 70, 92 Willis v. Maverick 85 Woods v. Littleton 39, 40 Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc. 52 Worthy v. Collagen Corp. 88 Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co. 92 dTpa Forms and praCTiCe Guide desk Book TOP......
  • Stage-specific effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy No. 2-2, October 2013
    • 7 October 2013
    ...22,196.5 25,803.2* 643,275.6 578.5 107.6 45,025.4 72,577.5**D.Expit 623,554.6* 23,578.3 785,299.8 1,949.9 2,442.4 117,721.1 109,931.4D.Lit 39,668 26,147.5 3,112,301 447.1 1,552.1 34,221.4 57,812.9D.Scons 18,218.5 326.9 384,772 30 240.9* 3,542.1 6,497.9D.Econs 31,252.7 2,643.6 306......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT