Polessk, The (Akademik Iosif Orbeli)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
The ‘Reecon Wolf’
...SGHC 303 (folld) Morguard Investments Ltd v De Savoye [1990] 3 SCR 1077 (refd) Peng Yan, The [2009] 1 HKLRD 144 (refd) Polessk, The [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 40 (refd) Q&M Enterprises Sdn Bhd v Poh Kiat [2005] 4 SLR (R) 494; [2005] 4 SLR 494 (refd) Rickshaw Investments Ltd v Nicolai Baron von Ue......
-
The "Reecon Wolf"
...defendant’s application for a stay are permissible, appropriate and effective (see The Lanka Athula [1991] 1 HKC 101; The Polessk [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 40 at 51-52 on inspection of vessel by an undertaking or to be imposed on the grant of stay). Mr Mohan identified eight factors which, as it......
-
Astian Group Ltd et Al v Tnk Industrial Holding Ltd et Al
...are any less acceptable than they were when English Courts made similar conclusions in The “Lakhta”, supra. and The “Polessk” [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 40. I therefore do not find that Russian Court procedures are inadequate to ensure procedural justice for the claimants. These particular clai......
-
New Link Consultants Ltd v Air China And Others
...that a stay can be granted consistently with the ends of justice. It is not uncommon in commercial cases : see e.g. The Polessk [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 40 at pp.44-45 where English proceedings were stayed in favour of Russia subject to a waiver of time (2) Quality of justice 92. The plaintiff......
1 books & journal articles
-
NO DISPUTE AMOUNTING TO STRONG CAUSE; STRONG CAUSE FOR DISPUTE?
...also reasonably clear that they do not come within any of the other heads either. 17 Citi-March v Neptune Orient Lines; The Polessk[1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 40 at 42; See also The Rothnie[1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 206; The Nile Rhapsody[1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 339, appeal dismissed [1994] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 38......