Polly Peck (Holdings) Plc v Trelford
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
147 cases
- Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd
-
Ganley v RTE
...the parts of which he complains, provided they can be separated from the rest for that purpose. As O'Connor L.J. stated in Polly Peck v. Trelford [ [1986] 1 QB 1000 at 1032]: "Where a publication contains two or more separate and distinct defamatory statements, the plaintiff is entitled to ......
- Lee Kuan Yew v Devan Nair (Straits Times Press (1975) Ltd and Another, Third Parties)
- McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...applied the principles in S and K Holdings Ltd v Throgmorton Publications Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 1036 and Polly Peck (Holdings) plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000. The court found that the common sting behind the two allegations - (i) that the plaintiff had requested for $3,000 in donations in return ......
-
The Reformulated Contextual Truth Defence: More Radical That First Appears
...[2016] NSWSC 295.7. Pamplin v Express Newspapers Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 116 (CA), 120 (Lord Neill).8. After Polly Peck Holdings plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000 (CA) (‘Polly Peck’).Collins 207 Whether a defamatory statement is separate and distinct from other defamatory statements contained inthe pu......