Ponnamma v Arumogam
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1905 |
| Year | 1905 |
| Date | 1905 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
Orange Ltd v Director of Telecommunications
...& CO V COMPETITION AUTHORITY 1999 1 ILRM 401 HENRY DENNY & SONS (IRL) LTD V MIN FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 1998 1 IR 34 PONNAMMA V ARUMOGAM 1905 AC 383 Synopsis Practice and Procedure Appeal to High Court; nature of appeal; scope of appeal; first named defendant refused to grant a mobile telepho......
-
Dennis O'Brien v Revenue Commissioners
...ORS CLAIMING THE "ALEXANDRA" 1863 33 LJ EX 209 1863 3 F & F 646 1864 10 HL CAS 704 1863-1864 12 WR 641 1863 176 ER 295 PONNAMMA v ARUMOGAM 1905 AC 383 1904-1905 21 TLR 524 SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF UNBORN CHILDREN (SPUC) v GROGAN & ORS 1989 IR 753 1990 ILRM 350 1990 1 CMLR 689 1989/8/24......
- Orange Ltd v Director of Telecoms (No 2)
-
Eastman v R
...Committee was not to receive such evidence. It determined appeals on the materials before the courts of the colonies. In 1905 in Ponnamma v Arumogam86, Lord Davey speaking for the Committee said: ‘Without limiting the extent of His Majesty's prerogative, their Lordships can safely say that ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
APPEAL
...before it, and applying the relevant and applicable law, the inferior Court came to a right or wrong decision. See Ponnamma v. Arumogani (1905) A.C. 383 applied by Oputa, J.S.C. in A.-G. of Oyo State & Anor. v. Fairlakes Hotel Ltd. S.C. 169/1986 delivered on 2nd December, 1998) reported......