Ponnamma v Arumogam

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1905
Date1905
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Orange Ltd v Director of Telecommunications
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 18 March 1999
    ...& CO V COMPETITION AUTHORITY 1999 1 ILRM 401 HENRY DENNY & SONS (IRL) LTD V MIN FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 1998 1 IR 34 PONNAMMA V ARUMOGAM 1905 AC 383 Synopsis Practice and Procedure Appeal to High Court; nature of appeal; scope of appeal; first named defendant refused to grant a mobile telepho......
  • Orange Ltd v Director of Telecoms (No 2)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 May 2000
  • Dennis O'Brien v Revenue Commissioners
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 27 June 2014
    ...ORS CLAIMING THE "ALEXANDRA" 1863 33 LJ EX 209 1863 3 F & F 646 1864 10 HL CAS 704 1863-1864 12 WR 641 1863 176 ER 295 PONNAMMA v ARUMOGAM 1905 AC 383 1904-1905 21 TLR 524 SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF UNBORN CHILDREN (SPUC) v GROGAN & ORS 1989 IR 753 1990 ILRM 350 1990 1 CMLR 689 1989/8/24......
  • John Dee Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 3 February 1995
    ...Appeal) WLR[1985] 1 WLR 647 John v Reese ELR[1970] Ch 345 Mr Wishmore Ltd v C & E Commrs VAT(1988) 3 BVC 311 Ponnamma v Arumogan ELR[1905] AC 383 Quilter v Mapleson ELR(1882) 9 QBD 672 R v Broadcasting Complaints Commission, ex parte OwenELR[1985] QB 1153 R v Secretary of State for the Envi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Appeals
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Assets of Community Value. Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2017
    ...at least some of the cases referred to in paragraph 6.101, footnote 187 are Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672 and Ponnamma v Arumogam [1905] AC 383. However, these do not, in the author’s respectful view, answer the point. Quilter v Mapleson did, indeed, hold that appeals to the Court of ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Assets of Community Value. Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2017
    ...202, [2004] 1 BCLC 88 3.168 Polemis and Furness Withy & Co Ltd, Re [1921] 3 KB 560, (1921) 8 Ll L Rep 351, CA 5.130 Ponnamma v Arumogam [1905] AC 383, PC 6.107, 6.108, 6.118, 6.120 Pullan v Leeds City Council [2016] UKFTT CR/2015/0011 (GRC) 4.14, 4.17, 4.22, 4.23, 4.145, App 3 Punch Partner......
  • APPEAL
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition A
    • 7 September 2019
    ...before it, and applying the relevant and applicable law, the inferior Court came to a right or wrong decision. See Ponnamma v. Arumogani (1905) A.C. 383 applied by Oputa, J.S.C. in A.-G. of Oyo State & Anor. v. Fairlakes Hotel Ltd. S.C. 169/1986 delivered on 2nd December, 1998) reported......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT