Port v Auger
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Simon Lowes
...relief sought”. See [34] per Pereira CJ. 76 The question was also addressed by Ferris J in Engel v Peri [2002] BPIR 961 and by Harman J in Port v Auger [1994] 1 WLR 862 at 874. Engel v Peri was concerned with an application by a bankrupt to challenge the trustee in bankruptcy's expenses in......
-
Bank of Baroda v Patel
...interest to be able to use and rely upon section 303 of the Act. The relevant test to which reference was made appears from the case of Port v Auger [1994] 1 WLR 862 at page 874A per Harman J, who said: “To my mind, a person can only be 'dissatisfied' if he can show that he has some substan......
-
Engel v Peri
...interest which has been adversely affected by whatever is complained of. This accords with the view expressed by Jeremiah Harman J in Port v Auger [1994] 1 WLR 862 at pages 15 It is at the next step in the argument that I part company with Miss Agnello. She contended that a bankrupt cannot......
-
Nicholas Miller (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Keith Bayliss) v Donna Jane Bayliss
...99103. I have also had the benefit other cases giving consideration to the 1986 Act, including Re Don Basil Williams [2003] BPIR 545, Port v Auger [1994] 1WLR 862 and I have seen nothing to persuade me that the test in Shepherd, reflecting Osborn, is 100104. I also note the admonition in m......
Request a trial to view additional results