Powell v Powell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1900 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Gregg v Kidd
...to act further for a client who refuses to accept his advice not to proceed with a transaction. Farwell J. in Powell v. PowellELR [1900] 1 Ch. 243 not followed. Decision of the Privy Council in Inche Noriah v. Shaik Allie Bin OmarELR [1929] A.C. 127 approved and followed; 5, that the defend......
-
Michele Alexia Canham v Cutty Sark Land Company
...involving banks as third parties. The Court, however, should find the cases of Bullock v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1954] 1 Ch 517 and Powell v Powell [1900] 1 Ch 243, Simpson v Simpson [1992] 1 FLR 601 and Mundinger v Mundinger (1[9]68) 3 DLR (3d) 338 very helpful in their analysis and application ......
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
...involving banks as third parties. The Court, however, should find the cases of Bullock v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1954] 1 Ch 517 and Powell v Powell [1900] 1 Ch 243, Simpson v Simpson [1992] 1 FLR 601 and Mundinger v Mundinger (1[9]68) 3 DLR (3d) 338 very helpful in their analysis and application ......
-
Marie O'Carroll v Paul F Diamond (practising as Paul F Diamond and Company Solicitors)
...v. Kidd [1956] I.R. 183. At p. 201 and 202, Budd J. approved certain principles from the judgment of Farwell J. in Powell v. Powell [1900] 1 Ch. 243. These were:" (1) A solicitor who acts for both parties cannot be independent of the donee in fact; and (2) To satisfy the court that the do......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...287, CA 173 Powell v Powell (1866) LR 1 P & D 209, 35 LJP & M 100, [1861–73] All ER Rep 362, 14 LT 800, Ct of Prob 112 Powell v Powell [1900] 1 Ch 243, 69 LJ Ch 164, 44 Sol Jo 134, 82 LT 84, ChD 78 Price v Craig [2006] EWHC 2561 (Ch), [2006] WTLR 1873, 9 ITELR 393, ChD 119, 127 Q v Q [2008]......
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...cohabitee be separately advised, supra n 15 at 197. 25 Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV, The Times, 1 July 1996, citing Powell v Powell[1900] 1 Ch 243 at 246 (Farwell J); cfRe Coomber[1911] 1 Ch 723 at 730 (CA); Inche Noriah v Shaik Allie bin Omar[1927] AC 127 at 135 (PC) which suggest tha......
-
Banking Law
...The presumption of undue influence in a minor”s favour might continue to apply to a minor newly come of age. In Powell v Powell[1900] 1 Ch 243, Farwell J decided that there was a presumption of undue influence in a gift made by a child, who recently came of age, to her parents. A case of un......