Practice Direction (Criminal Appeals: Summaries) (No. 2)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2000 |
Year | 2000 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
AA v Persons Unknown
...of property in particular statutory contexts, there are at least two concerning property in general. In Swift v Dairywise Farms Ltd[2000] 1 WLR 1177, the court held that a milk quota could be the subject of a trust; and in Armstrong v Winnington[2013] Ch 156, the court held that an EU carbo......
-
Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd
... ... Case No: HC10C00532 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ... Armstrong's practice has been to retain any surplus EUAs it holds ... ...
-
Swift v Dairywise Farms Ltd
...came before Mr Justice Jacob in Bristol on 2 and 3 November 1999. He delivered a written judgment on 17 November 1999, now reported at [2000] 1 WLR 1177. He held (i) that milk quota was capable of being the subject matter of a trust, and (ii) that, on the facts, Farms held all the quota in......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Solving the crypto-crossword: UK developments in the legal and regulatory treatment of cryptoassets
...9 Legal Statement, paragraph 86(a) 10 Armstrong v Winnington [2012] EWHC 10, [2013] Ch 156 11 Dairy Swift v Dairywise Farms Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 1177 12 Legal Statement, paragraph 45 Solving the Crypto-Crossword | 2020 4 © Allen & Overy LLP 2020 An analogy is drawn with a bank payment where fun......
-
Solving the Crypto-Crossword
...in question. Legal Statement, paragraph 86(a) Armstrong v Winnington [2012] EWHC 10, [2013] Ch 156 Dairy Swift v Dairywise Farms Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 1177 Legal Statement, paragraph 45 Legal Statement, paragraph 60 See for instance “Disposals of cryptoassets, tax & the UKJT Legal Statement” by ......