Practice Direction (House of Lords: Procedure Amendments) (No. 2)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1996 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Between: (1) Lea Lilly Perry (2) Tamar Perry Appellants v (1) Lopag Trust R (2) Private Equity Services (Curacao) NV (3) Fiduciana Verwaltungsanstalt (4) Gal Greenspoon (5) Yael Perry (6) Dan Greenspoon (7) Ron Greenspoon (8) Mia Greenspoon (9) Admintrust Verwaltungs Anstalt Respondents
...purpose of the funding application to the judge. In a Beddoe application, as Lightman J stated in Alsop Wilkinson (a firm) v Neary [1996] 1 WLR 1220, 1225, “ the purpose of the application is to inform the judge as to the strengths and weaknesses of the trustees' case and the course to be ......
-
Karen Pegler v Timothy Bruce McDonald
...disputes involving trustees or personal representatives are usually divided into three kinds: see eg Alsop Wilkinson v Neary [1996] 1 WLR 1220, 1224–1225. The first kind is a trust dispute, where there is a dispute about the terms of the trust or the assets which are subject to it. This ca......
-
Mccallum Jnr v Mccallum and Others as Trustees of The Mccallum Family Trust
...at [48–039]–[48–040]. 30 At [48–002] (footnotes omitted). 31 See the discussion commencing at [43] below. 32 Alsop Wilkinson v Neary [1996] 1 WLR 1220 (Ch). 33 At 1223–1224. 34 See, for example, McLaughlin v McLaughlin, above n 20, at [24]–[25]; and Jeremy Johnson and James Anson-Holland “......
-
Doleta Bean v Anthony Caisey
...I accept Mr. Harshaw's argument that Anthony, as executor, should have a neutral position in this case. In Alsop Wilkinson v Neary [1996] 1 WLR 1220 the Court stated “In a case where the dispute is between rival claimants to a beneficial interest in the subject matter of the trust, rather ......
Request a trial to view additional results