Practice Direction (Judge in Chambers: Procedure)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1983
Date1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 June 1987
    ...are sufficient grounds for the order being made ex parte. The practice direction: "Judge in Chambers: Procedure" of 30th March 1983: (1983) 1 W.L.R. 433: Supreme Court Practice 32/1—6/5 contains in paragraph B.3 (2) a list of the matters to be covered by an affidavit in support of an applic......
  • Beach Properties Barbuda Ltd et Al v Laurus Master Fund Ltd et Al
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • High Court (Antigua)
    • 9 February 2007
    ...made even if there had been full disclosure. [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 428 at 437. Cf the Practice Direction (Judge in Chambers: Procedure) [1983] 1 WLR 433. The relevant principles were later set out by Ralph Gibson LJ in the later case of Brink's — MAT Ltd v. Elcombe. Both the other judges ag......
  • Tunas (Pte) Ltd v Mayer Investments Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 February 1989
    ...the mandatory content of an applicant`s affidavits in an ex parte application for an interim injunction. The direction appears in [1983] 1 All ER 1119 at p 1120 and [1983] 1 WLR 433 at p 434. Part B para 3(1) starts off by calling attention to O 29 r 1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court whic......
  • Sakellarios Mavros v A A Constructions Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Dionisia Agapitos, Maria Passas, Cleo Ginnis, Tina Agapitos and Agapitos Agapitos (Interveners)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 February 1995
    ...a Writ issued, an undertaking should normally have been obtained to issue a Writ forthwith; see, for example, the Practice Note at (1983) 1 All ER 1119 and Siporex Trade S.A. v Comdel Commodities Ltd (supra). The Rules contain provision akin to O.29 r1(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT