Practice Direction (Judge in Chambers: Procedure)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1983 |
Date | 1983 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe
...are sufficient grounds for the order being made ex parte. The practice direction: "Judge in Chambers: Procedure" of 30th March 1983: (1983) 1 W.L.R. 433: Supreme Court Practice 32/1—6/5 contains in paragraph B.3 (2) a list of the matters to be covered by an affidavit in support of an applic......
-
Beach Properties Barbuda Ltd et Al v Laurus Master Fund Ltd et Al
...made even if there had been full disclosure. [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 428 at 437. Cf the Practice Direction (Judge in Chambers: Procedure) [1983] 1 WLR 433. The relevant principles were later set out by Ralph Gibson LJ in the later case of Brink's — MAT Ltd v. Elcombe. Both the other judges ag......
-
Tunas (Pte) Ltd v Mayer Investments Pte Ltd and Others
...the mandatory content of an applicant`s affidavits in an ex parte application for an interim injunction. The direction appears in [1983] 1 All ER 1119 at p 1120 and [1983] 1 WLR 433 at p 434. Part B para 3(1) starts off by calling attention to O 29 r 1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court whic......
-
Sakellarios Mavros v A A Constructions Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Dionisia Agapitos, Maria Passas, Cleo Ginnis, Tina Agapitos and Agapitos Agapitos (Interveners)
...a Writ issued, an undertaking should normally have been obtained to issue a Writ forthwith; see, for example, the Practice Note at (1983) 1 All ER 1119 and Siporex Trade S.A. v Comdel Commodities Ltd (supra). The Rules contain provision akin to O.29 r1(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1......
Request a trial to view additional results