Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1966 |
| Date | 1966 |
| Year | 1966 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
196 cases
-
R (on the application of AAA (Syria) and Others); R (on the application of HTN (Vietnam)); R (on the application of RM (Iran)); R (on the application of as (Iran)); R (on the application of SAA (Sudan)); R (on the application of ASM (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...their minds to the matter. 148 In circumstances where the point was not argued in G v G, the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234, concerning the departure of the Supreme Court from its earlier decisions, has no application. On the present appeal, the Supreme Court, ha......
-
Knauer (Widower and Administrator of the Estate of Sally Ann Knauer) v Ministry of Justice
...date would not involve a departure from those previous decisions, and therefore did not require the appellant to rely on the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234, whereby the House of Lords declared that it could depart from its previous decisions. This contention rest......
-
The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and HQP Corporation Ltd (in official liquidation)
...than does the House of Lords, it is in no position on a question of English law to invoke the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1234 of July 1966 pursuant to which the House has assumed the power to depart in certain circumstances from a previous decision of the House......
-
The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and HQP Corporation Ltd (in Official Liquidation)
...binding effect of precedent than does the House of Lords, it is in no position on a question of English law to invoke the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1234 of July 1966 pursuant to which the House has assumed the power to depart in certain circumstances from a pr......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
2021 Year in Review - Civil Fraud
...challenge, and, in the right circumstances, we may see aspects of the decision revisited once again.1 [2021] UKSC 24 2 [2007] UKHL 213 [1966] 1 WLR 1234 4 (2018) 134 LQR 695 [2008] UKHL 19 © 2022 Akin Gum p Strauss Hauer & Feld 72021 Year in Review - Civil Fra udLeeds City Council and Newha......
-
A Restrictive Interpretation?
...test. This test, which emanates from the majority speeches in the House of Lords in Esso Petroleum Ltd v Harper's Garage Southport Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 1234, focusses on whether, in entering the covenant, the covenantor was giving up a pre-existing freedom. If, prior to giving the covenant, it ......
34 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...134. 110 Pursuant to the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1994] 2 SLR 689, similar to that issued by the House of Lords at [1966] 1 WLR 1234 and now applicable in the UK Supreme Court: Austin v Southwark London Borough Council [2011] 1 AC 355 at [24]–[25]; UK Supreme Court Practice ......
-
Cases referred to in 1983
...89 SCt. 1944 L.Ed 2nd 491. 495 Powell v. McCormack 395 U.S. 486. 318 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1983 Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) (1966) 1 W.L.R. 1234. 229 Prigg v. Pennsylvania 16 Pet. 539: US Sup. Ct. Reports 1060 L.E.D. 1st series 229 Queen ex-parte Ekpenoa v. Ozogula II 1962 All N.......
-
The Need to Kill Off Zombie Law
...that decisions will take86. RvC[2004] EWCA Crim 292; [2004] 1 WLR 2098 [10]–[17].87. Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234; (1986) 83 Cr App R 191 HL (and applicable to the SupremeCourt).88. Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 [85]. The case does not stand alone, for example RvHowe [198......
-
Table of Cases
...and Citation) CA, Lord Woolf CJ, 11 January 2001, (2001) The Times , 16 January 2001 102 Practice Statement (HL: Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234, [1966] 3 All ER 77, [1966] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 151 7 Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 WLR 1381, [1971] 3 All ER 237, (1971) 115 SJ 654, HL 114 Price v C......
Request a trial to view additional results