Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 1966 |
| Year | 1966 |
| Date | 1966 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
173 cases
-
R (on the application of AAA (Syria) and Others); R (on the application of HTN (Vietnam)); R (on the application of RM (Iran)); R (on the application of as (Iran)); R (on the application of SAA (Sudan)); R (on the application of ASM (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...may simply not have turned their minds to the matter. 148 In circumstances where the point was not argued in G v G, the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234, concerning the departure of the Supreme Court from its earlier decisions, has no application. On the present app......
- Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd
-
Merck Serono S.A. v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks
... ... This teleological approach is supported by later judicial consideration, including in the UK, and by the position adopted by the UK ... precedents, or one of the House of Lords, in accordance with the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234 ... A similar power was ... ...
-
R v Shivpuri
... ... 170(1)(b) - Criminal Attempts Act 1981 ( c. 47 ) , s. 1 - Judicial PrecEdent - House of Lords decisions - Power to overrule previous ... having drugs and under caution he typed his own confession statement and stated that he very deeply suspected that the substance was heroin ... from the present appeal, would be departed from under the Practice Statement (post, pp. 1000E–F , 1001G–H ) ... Anderton v. Ryan ... ...
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
2021 Year in Review - Civil Fraud
...challenge, and, in the right circumstances, we may see aspects of the decision revisited once again.1 [2021] UKSC 24 2 [2007] UKHL 213 [1966] 1 WLR 1234 4 (2018) 134 LQR 695 [2008] UKHL 19 © 2022 Akin Gum p Strauss Hauer & Feld 72021 Year in Review - Civil Fra udLeeds City Council and Newha......
-
If It Ain't Broke Don't Fix It - Contract Interpretation After Chartbrook v Persimmon
...for many years and several times affirmed by the House. There is power to do so under the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234. But that was intended, as Lord Reid said in R v. National Insurance Comrs, Ex p Hudson [1972] AC 944, 966, to be applied only in a small numbe......
-
Divergence On The Proximity Test For "Nervous Shock"' Will It Last?
...[2013] EWCA Civ 194. 9. ibid para.93. 10. London Street Tramways v London County Council [1898] AC 375. 11. The Practice Statement [1966] 3 All ER 77. 12. Séamus Henchy, Precedent in the Irish Supreme Court, Modern Law Review, Volume 25 Issue 5, September 13. ibid 15. 14. [2015] IESC 31. 15......
17 books & journal articles
-
The Need to Kill Off Zombie Law
...that decisions will take86. RvC[2004] EWCA Crim 292; [2004] 1 WLR 2098 [10]–[17].87. Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234; (1986) 83 Cr App R 191 HL (and applicable to the SupremeCourt).88. Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 [85]. The case does not stand alone, for example RvHowe [198......
-
The legal and commercial frameworks
...by its own decisions, unless the court thinks it is right to depart from a previous decision: practice Statement ( Judicial precedent) [1966] 1 WLr 1234. See also Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] 1 aC 1101 at 1120–1121 [41], per Lord Hofmann. 69 Goodson v Richardson (1874) LR 9 C......
-
Tools and Techniques
...court is invited to depart from a decision which really is one of its own. 376 Practice Statement (Judicial Statement) of 26 July 1966: [1966] 1 WLR 1234. 377 Horton v Sadler [2006] UKHL 27, [2007] 1 AC 307, The Law 127 (g) The Court of Appeal and the pre-2021 case law of the European Cour......
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...134. 110 Pursuant to the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1994] 2 SLR 689, similar to that issued by the House of Lords at [1966] 1 WLR 1234 and now applicable in the UK Supreme Court: Austin v Southwark London Borough Council [2011] 1 AC 355 at [24]–[25]; UK Supreme Court Practice ......
Get Started for Free
