Practice Statement (Judicial Review: Costs)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 20 May 2004 |
| Date | 20 May 2004 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R (Davey) v Aylesbury Vale District Council
...for the full court to carry out an authoritative review of the whole position. 5 The Practice Statement (Judicial Review: Costs) [2004] 1 WLR 1760 deems the pre-permission costs, if the order is silent on them, to be costs in the case. This will be the norm in cases where permission has be......
-
R (Anthony Raphael) v Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court
...in a defendant's favour (a) the order has to be regarded as including any reasonably incurred preparation costs; but (b) Practice Statement (Judicial Review: Costs) [2004] 1 WLR 1760 should be read so as to exclude any costs of opposing the grant of permission in open court, which should be......
-
Dale Austin v The Public Service Commission, The Attorney General of Jamaica, Marlene Aldred
...does not commence until permission is granted and the claim is filed. Counsel cited the UK Practice Statement (Judicial Review: Costs) 2004 1WLR 1760 which provides as follows: “ It is necessary in judicial review claims to obtain permission and it has sometimes been suggested that a succes......
-
R (Davey) v Aylesbury Vale District Council
...were brought before the court. For that attention to professional probity I am grateful. 1 Practice Statement (Judicial Review: Costs) [2004] 1 WLR 1760 2 Extracts from paragraphs 14 to 18 and paragraph 3 Paragraph 71 of the judgmen 4 Paragraph 77 of the judgment 5 Bundle page 57 ...