Pratt v Pratt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1938 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1938 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
W v W. (No. 2)
...which, in my judgment, has to be applied to the facts of this case. I take my first from the well—known case in the House of Lords of Pratt v. Pratt, reported in 1939 Appeal Cases, page 417. I will read a passage from Lord Romer's Opinion, beginning at the bottom of page 426, and, particula......
-
Bell v Bell
...statutory period of four years prescribed by the Act of 1573. As my noble and learned friend Lord Macmillan remarked in Pratt v. Pratt, 1939, A.C. 417, it was inherent in the conception of marital desertion that the desertion must be persisted in without the consent and against the wishes o......
-
Re Dankbars
...and complexity; but the learned Judge felt that the case was concluded so far as he was concerned by two cases, the first called Pratt v. Pratt, in 1927, and the second Markham v. Markham, in 1946, both being decisions of the Divisional Court of the Probate, Divorce & Admiralty Division; an......
-
Brewer v Brewer
...necessary to constitute desertion. 22 In support of this proposition reliance is pieced on the well-known statement of Lord Lacmillen in pratt v. Pratt (1939 Appeal Cases, page 417) where he said at page 420: "In fulfilling its duty of determining whether on the evidence a case of desertion......
Request a trial to view additional results