Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
48 cases
-
Thomson Holidays Ltd v Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd
...the subset. Whether section 46(5) requires the court to do that has led to a division of judicial opinion. In Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 Neuberger J had to decide an action for infringement brought by Premier Brands who were importers, blenders and suppliers o......
-
Johnson & Johnson v Uni-Charm Kabushiki Kaisha (Uni-Charm Corporation)
...different from an earlier registered mark that is an ordinary English word. Admittedly, in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767, Neuberger J was of the view that the two marks “TY.PHOO” and “TYPHOON” were conceptually different but it cannot be overlooked that he had ac......
-
Richemont International SA v Goldlion Enterprise (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...Co, LP, The v Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd [2005] 4 SLR (R) 816; [2005] 4 SLR 816 (refd) Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 (folld) Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491; [1990] RPC 341 (refd) “Royal Enfield” Trade Marks [2002] RPC 24 (refd) ......
-
Reemtsma Cigarttenfabriken GMBH v Hugo Boss AG (No 2)
...section 22) argued for by the Respondent was upheld. Other cases like Zippo TM [1999] RPC 173 and Premier Brands UK v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 have held that there was no 26 In Invermont, the hearing officer reached the conclusion that there was no discretion in section 47, but cou......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Death By A Thousand Cuts? Court Of Appeal Refers Trade Mark Dilution Questions To ECJ
...it in various dissimilar goods cases and that the UK national decisions on the point are wrong (e.g Premier Brands v Typhoon Europe [2000] FSR 767 which held that Article 5(2) does not enable the proprietor of a well-known registered mark to object as a matter of course to the use of a sign......
5 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was then dealt with at length in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767 by Neuberger J who, with diffidence, preferred the view that there is no discretion to revoke, after having regard to the equivalent provis......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...RPC 173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was dealt with at length in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767 by Neuberger J who preferred the view that there is no discretion to revoke. He reasoned (at 811) that: [I]t is not only a privilege for a p......
-
Trade-Mark Tarnishment: Should We ‘Laugh It Off’ all the Way to ‘Telkomsucks’ and ‘Hellcom’?
...laws. So a person’s right to freedom of expression may be limited if it confl icts with another person’s right to a trade mark.2717 [2000] FSR 767 (Ch).18 See Nicola Dagg & Emma Alonko 2004 (79) Marques Newsletter 6–7.19 Idem at 7.20 See Hormel Goods Corp v Jim Henson Productions 73 F 3d 4......
-
The promotional use of a trade mark: Its potential to have significance
...was rejecte d.35 This implies that even the fa ct that goods were given away for free was relevant, as discu ssed in more detail later. 31 2000 FSR 767.32 Premier Brands (n 31) 768.33 Premier Brands (n 31) 804 : 1. Has there bee n a use of the type co ntemplated by sect ion 46(1) (which I s......
Get Started for Free
