Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
154 cases
-
Thomson Holidays Ltd v Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd
...and extract the subset. Whether section 46(5) requires the court to do that has led to a division of judicial opinion. In Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 Neuberger J had to decide an action for infringement brought by Premier Brands who were importers, blenders and......
-
Johnson & Johnson v Uni-Charm Kabushiki Kaisha (Uni-Charm Corp)
...different from an earlier registered mark that is an ordinary English word. Admittedly, in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767, Neuberger J was of the view that the two marks “TY.PHOO” and “TYPHOON” were conceptually different but it cannot be overlooked that he had ac......
-
Richemont International SA v Goldlion Enterprise (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...Co, LP, The v Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd [2005] 4 SLR (R) 816; [2005] 4 SLR 816 (refd) Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 (folld) Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491; [1990] RPC 341 (refd) “Royal Enfield” Trade Marks [2002] RPC 24 (refd) ......
-
Reemtsma Cigarttenfabriken GMBH v Hugo Boss AG (No 2)
...section 22) argued for by the Respondent was upheld. Other cases like Zippo TM [1999] RPC 173 and Premier Brands UK v Typhoon Europe Ltd [2000] FSR 767 have held that there was no 26 In Invermont, the hearing officer reached the conclusion that there was no discretion in section 47, but cou......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Death By A Thousand Cuts? Court Of Appeal Refers Trade Mark Dilution Questions To ECJ
...it in various dissimilar goods cases and that the UK national decisions on the point are wrong (e.g Premier Brands v Typhoon Europe [2000] FSR 767 which held that Article 5(2) does not enable the proprietor of a well-known registered mark to object as a matter of course to the use of a sign......
8 books & journal articles
-
THE IP CHAPTER IN THE US-SINGAPORE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
...(M) Sdn Bhd’s Trade Mark[2000] RPC 484; Pfizer Ltd v Eurofood Link (U.K.) Ltd[2001] FSR 3; Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767. For decisions from the UK Trade Marks Registry, see Paco/Paco Life in Colour Trade Marks[2000] RPC 451; Inlima SL’s Application Opposition of ......
-
THE SENSE AND SENSIBILITY IN THE ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT
...146Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Haute Diggity Dog LLC507 F 3d 252 at 266 (4th Cir, 2007). 147Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767. 148 Explanatory Note 4.4 of the World Intellectual Property Organization Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Wel......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was then dealt with at length in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767 by Neuberger J who, with diffidence, preferred the view that there is no discretion to revoke, after having regard to the equivalent provis......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...RPC 173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was dealt with at length in Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd[2000] FSR 767 by Neuberger J who preferred the view that there is no discretion to revoke. He reasoned (at 811) that: [I]t is not only a privilege for a p......
Request a trial to view additional results