Price v Rhondda Urban Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1923
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Smith v Cardiff Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 4 November 1953
    ...seems, however, to me that this case, on its facts, may well be quite distinct from that of ( Price v. Rhondda Urban District Council 130 Law Times, page 156), where the plaintiff sued on behalf of a class, namely, married women teachers, to test the validity of a resolution of the Rhondda ......
  • Basanta-Henry, Audrey and Others v National Commercial Bank Jamaica Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 20 December 2004
    ...required him to do. Defendant also sought to call in aid, the cases FRAZER v HATTON AND ANOR. 2 C.B. (N.S.) 516, and PRICE v RHONDDA URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL (1923) 2 CH 372, but I don't believe that these cases take the submission on consideration any further. Counsel posited that Stilk v M......
  • Dr. Harish Chandra v Dr. Vidhu Mayor
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 19 July 2016
    ...in the case. They are not full parties because they are not liable individually for the costs. That was held by Eve J in Price v Rhondda Urban District Council. But they are parties because they are bound by the result." 12 As pointed out by Cox J., in the Howells case, the wording of the t......
  • McVicar v Commissioner for Railways (Nsw)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Representative Procedures and the Future of Multi‐Party Actions
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 62-4, July 1999
    • 1 July 1999
    ...1 WLR 302.99 [1979] 1 WLR 637, 648, 651–2. See also Belcher vReading Corporation [1950] Ch 380 and Price vRhondda Urban District Council [1923] 2 Ch 372 (although the representative nature of the claim wasconsidered on the issue of costs, see [1923] WN 228). For support for the propriety of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT