Prince v Mapp

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date26 November 1969
Date26 November 1969
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • MacAonghusa v Ringmahon Company
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 November 1999
    ...1970 S130(a) (UK) STRONG & CO OF ROMSEY LTD V WOODIFIELD (SURVEYOR OF TAXES) 1906 AC 448, 5 TC 215 PRINCE V MAPP (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) 1970 1 WLR 260 MORGAN V TATE & LYLE LTD 1955 AC 21, 35 TC 367 MACKINLAY, INSPECTOR OF TAXES V ARTHUR YOUNG MCCLELLAND MOORES & CO 1989 STC 898 VODAFONE CE......
  • Mallalieu v Drummond
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 July 1983
    ...purposes. Such other purposes, if found to exist, will usually be the private purposes of the taxpayer. See for example Prince v. Mapp [1970] 1 W.L.R. 260. 24 To ascertain whether the money was expended to serve the purposes of the taxpayer's business it is necessary to discover the taxpaye......
  • Watkis v Ashford Sparkes & Harward
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 May 1985
  • Ian Flockton Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 March 1987
    ...other purposes. Such other purposes, if found to exist, will usually be the private purposes of the taxpayer. See for example Prince v. MappWLR[1970] 1 W.L.R. 260. To ascertain whether the money was expended to serve the purposes of the taxpayer's business it is necessary to discover the ta......
  • Get Started for Free