Proclamations
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1616 |
| Date | 01 January 1616 |
English Reports Citation: 77 E.R. 1352
King's Bench Division
[74] proclamationh. Mich. 8 Jac. 1. S. C. 2. Howel's State Trials 723. Com. Dig. Prser. D 2. D 3. Vin. Ab. Prer. S d. Gibson's Codex * 989. *991. Memorandum, that upon Thursday, 20 Sept. 8 Regis Jacobi, I was sent for to attend the Lord Chancellor, Lord Treasurer, Lord Privy Seal, and the Chancellor of the Duchy; there being present the attorney, the solicitor, and recorder: and two questions were moved to me by the Lord Treasurer; the one if the King by his proclamation may prohibit new buildings in and about London, &c.; the other, if the King may prohibit the making of starch of wheat; and the Lord Treasurer said, that these were preferred to the King as grievances, and against the law and justice: and the King hath answered, that he will confer with hia Privy Couucil, and his Judges, and then he will do right to them. To which I answered, that these questions were of great importance. 2. That they concerned the answer of the King to the body, viz. to the Commons of the House of Parliament. 3. That I did not hear of these questions until this morning at nine of the clock: for the grievances were preferred, and the answer made when I was in my circuit. And, lastly, both the proclamations, which now were shewed, were promulgated, anno 5 Jac. after my time of attorneyship: and for these reasons I did humbly desire them that I might have conference with my brethren the Judges about the answer of the King, and (a) If the property be sold by the pirates, the proceeds belong to the Grown. Case of The, Eden, 1 Hagg. Admr. Rep; 142. But the owners of the goods io that case petitioned the Treasury, who directed the proceeds to be paid over to them ; the law expenses being first deducted. t Ace. Parker...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Council)
...1 S.C.R. 1075; Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 257; Case of Proclamations (1611), 12 Co. Rep. 74, 77 E.R. 1352; Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217; Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island, [1......
-
Hamed v R
...50 (CA) at 62, citing RFV Heuston Essays in Constitutional Law (2nd ed, Stevens & Sons, London, 1964) at 34. 58 Proclamations' Case (1611) 12 Co Rep 74, 77 ER 1352. See also Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 59 AV Dicey Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th ed, Ma......
-
R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2)
... ... 149 Fourthly, the scope of the royal prerogative to legislate in council is "a pure question of English common law": Sammut v Strickland at p 697. The principle goes back to The Case of Proclamations (1611) 12 Co Rep 74 , 76, where Coke CJ said that "the King hath no prerogative, but that which the law of the land allows him". Lord Mansfield's six propositions in Campbell v Hall demonstrate, first, that the Crown's prerogative power to legislate in Council was not regarded as an equivalent ... ...
-
Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha of Trinidad and Tobago Inc., Maharaj, Islamic Relief Centre Ltd and Ishmael v Attorney General
...the Lords of the Privy Council, that the King had no prerogative but that which the law of the land allowed him: Proclamations' Case (1611) 12 Co Rep 74, 75. It is now well established that the courts have jurisdiction under the common law to inquire into the existence or extent of any alle......
-
Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
...151 CLR 170, 218; see also Re Ditfort; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 FCR 347, 368 (Gummow J). 31 Proclamations (1611) 12 Co Rep 74; 77 ER 1352, 1354 (Sir Edward Coke). 32 Victorian Council for Civil Liberties Inc v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (200......
-
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE AND STATUTE IN AUSTRALIA.
...63 CLR 73, 83 (Latham CJ), 91 (Starke J), 98-9 (Dixon J), cited in Tampa Case (n 5) 501 [31] (Black CJ). (18) Case of Proclamations (1610) 12 Co Rep 74; 77 ER 1352, 1353 (Coke CJ). See Bill of Rights 1688, 1 Wm & M sess 2, c 2. See also R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the Eu......
-
?No Politics Please, We're British': R (Miller) v The Prime Minister; Cherry and Others v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41
...the Crown-in-Parliament. Since the Crown now has a functionally negligible say in the matter, 76 this model gives the Houses 70 ibid. 71 12 Co Rep 74, 77 ER 1352. 72 [1920] AC 508; Fire Brigades Union (n 47). 73 David Feldman, ‘Pulling a Trigger or Starting a Journey? Brexit in the Supreme ......
-
The Effect of Treaty Withdrawal on Implementing Legislation
...‘International Law in Domestic Courts: The Developing Framework’(2008) 124 Law Quarterly Review 388, 399.15. Case of Proclamations (1611) 12 Co Rep 74, 75.16. Laurence R Helfer, ‘Exiting Treaties’ (2005) 91(7) Virginia Law Review 1579, 1588.17. See, eg, Elliott, above n 2, 265; Alison L You......