Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2007
CourtChancery Division (Patents Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Review 2 Pty Ltd v Redberry Enterprise Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Review Australia Pty Ltd v New Cover Group Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • (1) Cantel Medical (UK) Ltd v ARC Medical Design Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 23 February 2018
    ...the RCD, whether considering freedom of design under art.6, see Proctor v Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 3154 (Ch); [2007] FSR 13 at [42], or under art.10, see Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206; [2012] FSR 4, at [18]. 172 The General Court discussed designer freed......
  • PMS International Group Plc v Magmatic Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 March 2016
    ...is sought to be clearly distinguished. for entry in the Register of Community Designs". 10 As Jacob LJ said in Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2008] FSR 8, para 3: "The most important things in a case about registered designs are: (1) the registered design; (2) the accuse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • How To Prevent Your Design Protection Being Trunki-ated
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 24 June 2016
    ...of the Trunki ruling suggest that designs can be protected as "shape only" and "shape and more". Procter & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] FSR13 was cited as an example of a case where line drawings were successful in protecting a "shape only" design. In contrast, the computer-aided d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT