Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corporation v Peter Cremer G.m.b.H. & Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1988 |
Year | 1988 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- Associated Pan Malaysia Cement Sdn Bhd v Syarikat Teknikal & Kejuruteraan Sdn Bhd
-
Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.v v Lebanese Organisation for International Commerce (Lorico)
...(p.230). 64 These authorities were reviewed and extensively quoted by Hirst J. in The Manila (Proctor & Gamble v. Peter Cremer) [1988] 3 All E.R. 843. He concluded :- "Perhaps the best lesson to be drawn from all this subsequent commentary is that no distinctive principle of law can be dist......
-
Harry Gordon Cressman and Barbara Gordon Cressman (Personal Representatives of Thomas Ashley Cressman (Deceased) v Coy of Kensington (SALES) Ltd v Randall McDonald [CA (Civil), 05/02/2004]
...as and when acquired. This basis of recovery was approved in principle by Hirst J in a dictum in Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corpn. v. Peter Cremer GmbH (The Manila) [1988] 3 AER 843. In BP Exploration Co. (Libya) Ltd. v. Hunt (No. 2) [1979] 1 WLR 783, Robert Goff J used a sim......
-
ERDC Group Ltd v Brunel University
...as and when acquired. This basis of recovery was approved in principle by Hirst J in a dictum in Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corpn. v. Peter Cremer GmbH (The Manila) [1988] 3 AER 843. In BP Exploration Co. (Libya) Ltd. v. Hunt (No. 2) [1979] 1 WLR 783, Robert Goff J used a sim......
Request a trial to view additional results