Productivity and Enterprise: A World Class Competition Regime
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2001 |
Year | 2001 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Hewitt v Rivers
...310 U.S. 296; 60 S. Ct. 900; 128 A.L.R. 1352; 84 L Ed 1213, referred to. (7) Chaitan v. Att.-Gen., Trinidad & Tobago C.A., July 31st, 2001, unreported, distinguished. (8) Cooper v. CadwaladarSC(1904), 7 F. 146; 12 SLT 449; 42 S.L.R. 117, referred to. (9) Crittenden v. Anderson, High Ct. of ......
-
Ronald Green Appellant v Petter Saint Jean Respondent [ECSC]
...of Trinidad and Tobago et al Civil Appeal Nos. 21 and 22 of 2001, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Court of Appeal (delivered 31st July 2001, unreported) distinguished; Ezechiel Joseph v Alvina Reynolds and Lenard "Spider"Montoute v Emma Hippolyte Saint Lucia High Court Civil Appeal No. 14 o......
-
R v Livingston, Drysdale and Ricketts
...from primary evidence and common design, not on lies told by the appellant (See also Courtney Vassell v R SCCA 108/98 dated 31st July 2001 (unreported)). 106 We agree with Mr. Fraser for the prosecution that the learned trial judge was examining the discrepancies in the statements of the ap......
-
Storage Computer Corporation and Another v Hitachi Data Systems Ltd
...of claim. 'Mere collocation' 73 Mr Prescott QC contended., largely on the strength of the judgment of Laddie J in SABAF v MFI ( 31 July 2001, unreported) that what he called a 'mere collocation' lacked inventive step. Where there were two problems, each with old or obvious solutions, then i......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Incorporation
...[1897] AC 22 Eng. HL. 31. 4. [1975] 3 All ER 81, [1975] 3 WLR 232. 5. Donovan Crawford v FIS SCCA Nos. 64 & 88 of 1999, delivered July 31, 2001(unreported). Incorporation there has been no consistent principle for ignoring the separate legal entity doctrine. More recently, after much judici......