Project Development Company Ltd S.A. v K.M.K. Securities Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1982 |
| Year | 1982 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Dunne v Fox
...applies to the Court for a variation of the order. In Project Development Company Limited S.A. -v- K.M.K. Securities Limited, (1983) 1 All E.R. 465, it was held that, while the successful third party intervener should be allowed all his reasonable costs, it was also held to be right that he......
-
Arcelormittal USA LLC v Mr Ravi Ruia
...defendant with which the third party is in no way concerned.” (at p 542–3 per Kerr LJ) iii) Project Development Co Ltd v KMK Securities [1982] 1 WLR 1470: “… it is an essential aspect of the jurisdiction to grant Mareva types of injunction that the position of innocent third parties should......
-
Daewoo International Corporation v America Metals Trading Llp
...should be conducted. Daewoo recommends that a similar approach should be adopted here. Reference was made to Project Development Co Ltd SA v KMK Securities Ltd and Others [1983] 1 All ER 465, a decision of Parker J, as he then was, and to Westminster City Council v Porter and Weeks and oth......
-
Sakellarios Mavros v A A Constructions Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Dionisia Agapitos, Maria Passas, Cleo Ginnis, Tina Agapitos and Agapitos Agapitos (Interveners)
...be taxed on the indemnity basis in r63.27. In support, Mr Duguid relied on Project Development Co. Ltd S.A. v K.M.K. Securities Ltd (1982) 1 W.L.R. 1470. In that case the intervener was a bank, an innocent third party subject to a Mareva injunction; it successfully applied to have the inju......
Request a trial to view additional results