Pronek v Winnipeg, Selkirk and Lake Winnipeg Railway Company

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1932
Date1932
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Alldridge v Mulcahey
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Dubé v. Labar, (1986) 68 N.R. 91 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 1 May 1986
    ...15]. Grinnell Co. v. Warren, [1937] S.C.R. 353, refd to. [para. 15]. Pronek v. Winnipeg, Selkirk and Lake Winnipeg Railway Company, [1933] A.C. 61, refd to. [para. Olmstead v. Vancouver-Fraser Park District, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 831; 3 N.R. 326, refd to. [para. 16]. McCannell v. McLean, [1937] S......
  • Benek v. Pugash et al., 2004 BCSC 1452
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 October 2004
    ...should be made in order to uphold the jury's verdict: See, inter alia, Pronek v. Wpg., Selkirk & Lake Wpg. Ry. Co. [1932] 3 WWR 440, [1933] AC 61, 102 LJPC 12, and Fick v. B.C. Elec. Ry. Co. [1951] 1 DLR 81, at 84 (reversing [1950] 1 WWR 728)." [ Kraus at p. 398] [17] However, counsel f......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT