Pruessing against Ing
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 25 January 1821 |
| Date | 25 January 1821 |
English Reports Citation: 106 E.R. 912
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
Pruessing against Ing
pbuessing against ing. Thursday, January 25th, 1821. A promissory note for the payment of 301. at three months after date, with interest from the date, requires a stamp applicable to a note not exceeding 301. Declaration on a promissory note, by which the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff, three months after the date thereof, 301., with lawful interest from the date 4B.&ALD. 205. PITT V. SHEW 913 thereof. At the trial before Holroyd J., at the last Middlesex sittings, it appeared upon the production of the note that it was written on a stamp applicable to a 301. note. It was then objected, that inasmuch as the note was given for 301., with lawful...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Horan v Quilter
...IR 207 2002 1 ILRM 450 2001/3/735 STROUD STROUD'S JUDICIAL DICTIONARY OF WORDS & PHRASES 6ED 2000 JOULE V TAYLOR 7 EX 58 PRUESSING V ING 4 b & ALD 204 LONDON CHATHAM & DOVER RAILWAY CO V SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY CO 1893 AC 429 STEWART ARBITRATION COMMENTARY & SOURCES 2003 92 DEBTORS (IRL) ACT......
-
D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
... ... The application for special leave is brought by a client (the applicant) whose action for negligence against the respondents was summarily terminated on the basis that his statement of claim disclosed no arguable cause of action ... 3 ... ...