Pudsey v Newsam

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1792
Date01 January 1792
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 32

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Pudsey
and
Newsam

pudsey versus newsam. Mo. 682. 1 Brownl. 84. Debt. Debt of 5001. with condition, if the defendant before Michaelmas do make, acknowledge, and suffer, Ac. all and every such reasonable act and things, whatsoever they be, far the good and laivful assuring and sure-making of the manor of D. to J. .S'. and his heirs, that then, &c. the defendant pleaded that before Michaelmas the plaintiff' rationabiliter non requisivit the defendant ad faciendum, &c. aliqua rationabilia actum & acta, quce forent pro bona & legitima assurantia [45] of the manor of D. &c. The plaintiff replied, that such a day before Michaelmas he requested the defendant, quod ipse conveiaret & assuraret manerium de D. to J. S. &c. secundum tenorem conditionis; and upon that they were at issue, and it was found for the plaintiff, and alledg'cl in arrest of judgment, that no sufficient breach was assign'd; for the plaintiff ought to have required an assurance in certain, viz. a feoff'ment, or fine, or, &c. and not to have requested that the defendant conveiaret; for the condition being special, all and every act and acts, the request ought to have put the assurance to a certainty, what ought to be made. But non allocatur ; but the issue adjudg'd good, and the condition broke; for by the condition the defendant is to do all and every ad whatsoever for the assurance of the manor of D. So that if the plaintiff requested a fine, a feoffment, a recovery, a bargain and sale, the defendant ought to do all; but it was held, that he is not to execute any * bond, or recognisance for the enjoying of the manor, for that is but a collateral security, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Wilbraham v Snow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1845
    ...737. Cro. Jac. 73. Dalt. Office of Sheriff's, case 2, fol. 19, which case was adjudged aa reported in those books, against the report of Yelverton, 44, and the roll is in Easter 44 Eliz. Rol. 318,(3) (1) S. P. 6 Mod. 292, Clerk v. Withers; for he is answerable to the plaintiff to the value ......
  • Clerk against Withers
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1794
    ...case (I), execution was sued out, and goods seized after the party died, and it was doubted (d) Dyer, 99.-See also Ayre v. Alden, Yelv. 44. S. C. Moor, 757. () See 1 Vent. 52. 2 Saund. 47. (/) Wilbraham v. Snmo, 1 Mod. 30. S. C. 2 Saund. 47. S. C. 1 Sid. 438. S. C. 1 Lev. 282. S. C. 1 Vent.......
  • Rook against Wilmot
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • Invalid date
    ...against Wilmot [209] case 4. rook against wilmot. In debt upon a judgment, plea that the money was levied on s,fi. fa. is good. Post. 238. Yelv. 44. Latch. 589. 5 Co. 90. Moor, 468. 4 Leon. 194. Sav. 123. And. 247. Cro. Jac. 73. 2 Lev. 203. 2 Mod. 214. Salk. 223. 2 Ld. Ray. 1072. Debt upon ......
  • Wilbraham against Snow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1793
    ...them : to which it was answered, it is not like that case, for the absolute property remains in the owner after the seizure; as Dyer 98, 99. Yelv. 44, and that the sheriff might have trespass, but not this action. But the whole Court to the contrary, the sheriff has a special property suffi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT