Pyman v Dreyfus
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 25 October 1889 |
Date | 25 October 1889 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
United States Shipping Board v Frank C. Strick & Company, Ltd
...1872, L.R. 8 C.P. 46), ( Thiis v. Byers 1876, L.R. 1 Q.B.D. 244), ( Nelson v. Dahl 1879, L.R. 12 Ch.D. 568), ( Pyman v. Dreyfus 1889, L.R. 24 Q.B.D. 152), ( Leonis v. Rank L.R. 1908, 1 K.B. 499), and ( Alexander v. Aktieselskabet Hansa L.R. 1920, A.C. 88). 6 But these rules, like all other ......
-
Oldendorff (E. L.) & Company G.m.b.H. v Tradax Export S.A. (Johanna Oldendorff)
...the charterer may have properly required her to go,". 8And later (p. 509) he said: "It is clear from the decision in ( Pyman v. Dreyfus 24 Q.B.D. 152) that the vessel is at the usual place of discharge if she arrives at the business part of the port." 9A little later he referred to the com......
-
Oldendorff (E. L.) & Company G.m.b.H. v Tradax Export S.A. (Johanna Oldendorff)
...start until 29th March. 26 The arguments presented in that case were, for the appellants, that the case was governed by ( Pyman v. Dreyfus 24 Q.B.D. 152) which, it was said, established that a ship is "arrived" under a port Charter when she gets within the ambit of the named port; and for t......
-
Sociedad Financiera de Bienes Raices S.A. v Agrimpex Hungarian Trading Company for Agricultural Products; The Aello
...the physical act of loading was possible or impossible" at the spot where she lay. 19(2) Nelson v. Dahl, 12 Ch. D. 568, and Pyman Brothers v. Dreyfus Brothers & Co., 24 Q.B.D. 152, were the most directly relevant of the earlier authorities. The key words in Nelson v. Dahl for the purpose o......
Request a trial to view additional results