Qualcomm Inc. v Nokia Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2008] EWHC 777 (Ch)
Year2008
Date2008
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd and Others (Appellants/Claimants) v Asda Stores Ltd (Respondent/Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 April 2012
    ...that can be achieved is an estimate which is necessarily going to be somewhat crude." 31 The following concise statement by Floyd J in Qualcomm v Nokia [2008] EWHC 777 at [6] is also helpful: "The correct approach is to ask oneself three questions. First of all, who has won; secondly has th......
  • BOS GmbH & Company KG v Cobra UK Automotive Products Division Ltd ((in Administration)) (Costs)
    • United Kingdom
    • Patents County Court
    • 25 September 2012
    ...Apotex [2004] EWCA Civ 1703, referred to the judgment of Pumfrey J in Monsanto v Cargill [2007] EWHC 3133 and the judgment of Floyd J in Qualcomm v Nokia [2008] EWHC 277. The upshot of those judgments is having identified who won (no dispute about that here) the issue by issue approach invo......
  • Wobben Properties GmbH v Siemens Plc and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 16 September 2015
    ...and notionally have the winning party pay a proportion of the losing party's costs, which is a phrase used in the judgment of Floyd J Nokia v Qualcomm [2008] EWHC 777, is that it is not a criterion which is supposed to impose a specific requirement of exceptionality. I respectfully agree wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT