R B v HM Advocate

JurisdictionScotland
Neutral Citation2004 SCCR 443
Year2004
Date2004
CourtUnspecified Court (Scotland)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Gemmell, Robertson, Gibson and McCourt v HM Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 20 December 2011
    ...May 2009, unreported Petch v HM AdvocateSCUNK [2011] HCJAC 20; 2011 JC 210; 2011 SLT 391; 2011 SCCR 199; 2011 SCL 372 RB v HM AdvocateUNK 2004 SCCR 443; 2004 GWD 21-453 R v BarneyUNK [2007] EWCA Crim 3181; [2008] 2 Cr App R (S) 37 R v Delucca; R v Murray; R v StubbingsUNKWLRUNK [2010] EWCA ......
  • Lord Advocate V. Joseph Harrison
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 14 December 2007
    ...taken all relevant factors into account. The base figure selected by him before discount was consistent with that in R B v HM Advocate 2004 SCCR 443. If there were cogent reasons for allowing a discount, there required to be careful consideration before an appellate court would interfere. [......
  • Ss Against Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 8 July 2015
    ...in the present case was very clearly too high. [38] The second Scottish case to which Mr Lenehan referred was RB v Her Majesty’s Advocate 2004 SCCR 443 where a father pled guilty to the culpable homicide of his child by seizing it by the throat and placing his hand over its mouth and nose u......
  • Appeal Against Sentence By Sd Against Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 19 August 2015
    ...be seen as a case where the wickedness of the appellant was commensurate to that of the accused in HMA v IWKM 2003 SCR 499 or RB v HMA 2004 SCCR 443. Rather, this was a case which was essentially indistinguishable from that of SS v HMA [2015] HCJAC 63 where the Appeal Court had selected sev......
1 books & journal articles
  • Sentence Discount: Early Guilty Plea
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-2, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...instancehad not given discounts on guilty pleas: see Low v HM Advocate 2004SCCR 82; Smith v HM Advocate 2004 SCCR 85; and RB v HM Advocate2004 SCCR 443. In Smith v HM Advocate 2004 SCCR 521 it was asserted that an is entitled to tender a plea of guilty at any time he wishes. The chargesin t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT