R (Bhanji) v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date04 April 1977
Date04 April 1977
CourtImmigration Appeals Tribunal
TH/6845/76

Court of Appeal

Lord Denning MR, Geoffrey Lane, Cumming-Bruce LJJ

R
and
Immigration Appeal Adjudicator Ex parte Bhanji

K. S. Nathan for the applicant.

Appeal Right of appeal Application for variation of limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom made after expiry of that leave Refusal of application Whether right of appeal during period of extension granted in notice of refusalfor the purpose only of enabling applicant to make arrangements to leave the country Rule in Suthendran'sUNK case ([1977] Imm. A.R. 44) Immigration Act 1971, s 14(1).

Limited leave to enter or remain Refusal of a requested variation Whether an extension granted in refusal notice for the purpose only of enabling applicant to make arrangements to leave the country was a de novo leave giving fresh rights of application with rights of appeal Whether such variation an indulgence only, a permit to remain not amounting to a leave Rule in Suthendran'sUNK case ([1977] Imm. A.R. 44) Immigration Act 1971, s 14(1).

B, a citizen of Tanzania, entered the United Kingdom by leave on 29.8.75 for one month, and his leave was duly extended to 29.11.75. On 2.12.75 he applied for a further extension. This was refused by the Secretary of State on 18.5.76 in a notice which contained the following words:

For the purpose only of enabling you to make arrangements to leave this country your leave to enter is varied so as to permit you to remain in the United Kingdom until 18 June 1976. No further extension of stay will be granted. You are entitled to appeal against this decision under s 14(1) of the Immigration Act 1971 to the independent appellate authorities established under that Act. If you wish to appeal you should complete the attached form.

B lodged an appeal on 28.5.76, and on 30.11.76 an adjudicator ruled as a preliminary issue under r 11(1) of the Immigration Appeals (Procedure) Rules 1972 that he had no jurisdiction to hear the purported appeal because B's application for a variation of his leave, having been made after that leave had expired, B had no right of appeal under s 14(1) of the 1971 Act. (Court of Appeal's decision in R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p SubramaniamELRUNK [1976] Imm. A.R. 155,1 followed.)

On an application by B to the Court of Appeal (from the refusal of his application to the Divisional Court for leave to move for orders of certiorari and mandamus to reverse the adjudicator's decision) it was submitted for B that the Secretary of State in his notice of 18.5.76 had given B a de novo leave during which leave B...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Secretary of state for the home department v Said Souhama Ken'aan
    • United Kingdom
    • Immigration Appeals Tribunal
    • 31 July 1990
    ...AR 155. Suthendran v Immigration Appeal TribunalELR [1977] AC 359 [1977] Imm AR 44. R v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator ex parte Bhanji [1977] Imm AR 89. Selo Wa-Selo v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1990] Imm AR 76. Adolphus Lokko v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1......
  • Halil and Another v Davidson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 3 July 1980
    ...Latham for the respondent. 3 July 1980. The following opinions were delivered. R v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator, ex p BhanjiUNK ([1977] Imm. A.R. 89 (CA), d 4.4.77), considered. The facts are set out in the speech of Lord Russell Killowen. Appeal — Right of appeal — Application for variat......
  • Theori v Secretary of state for the home department
    • United Kingdom
    • Immigration Appeals Tribunal
    • 10 March 1980
    ...an indulgence extended to her on compassionate grounds; Words of Lord Denning MR in R v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator, ex p BhanjiUNK, [1977] Imm. A.R.89 at p 91, applied. R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p Ahluwalia (DC), (p 1 ante), and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Est......
  • Secretary of the state for the home department v Mary Leonor Lobo; Mary Leonor Lobo v Secretary of state for the home department
    • United Kingdom
    • Immigration Appeals Tribunal
    • 19 November 1983
    ...In view of this, and having regard to the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator ex parte Bhanji [1977] Imm AR 89, it was uncertain whether the extension granted from 2 July 1979 to 4 August 1979 was a de novo leave giving a right of appeal against a refusal t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT