R (Holme) v Liverpool Magistrates Court
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 3131 (Admin) |
Year | 2004 |
Date | 2004 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Nkromah v Willesden Magistrates' Court
...Zykin v Crown Prosecution Service [2009] EWHC 1469 Admin), but only to rectify a mistake or something akin to a mistake, R v Holme [2004] EWHC 3131 Admin) …" 12 She also referred to the statement of Laws LJ in R (M) Manorgale Ltd and Thames Magistrates [2013] EWHC 535 (Admin) at 8 that: "Th......
-
R Simon Williamson v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court Crown Prosecution Service (Interested Parties) Rhys Mardon
...Court which he cannot pursue because he has unequivocally pleaded guilty." (pages 416 -417) 34 R (Holme) v. Liverpool City Justices [2004] EWHC 3131 (Admin) was a case in which the Magistrates acceded to an application to revisit a sentence seven months after a conviction on the basis that ......
-
Trigger (R) v Northampton Magistrates Court
...imposing an immediate sentence of imprisonment. The claimant relies on the judgment of this Court in Holme v Liverpool City Justices [2004] EWHC 3131 (Admin). 21 Mr Knight, who appeared on behalf of the claimant, submitted that the magistrates could not use section 142 to resentence the cla......
-
Zykin v Crown Prosecution Service
...reasons, I declined to re-open the adjudication of 9th September.” 12 In Holme v Liverpool City Justices & Crown Prosecution Service [2004] EWHC 3131 (Admin), this court considered the proper interpretation of section 142(1) of the 1980 Act. The section itself is expressed in very broad ter......
Request a trial to view additional results