R M. v M. M
Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1942 |
Date | 01 January 1942 |
Court | High Court (Northern Ireland) |
Nullity - Petition by husband - Incapacity of wife to consummate - Frigidity - Impotence - Hysteria - Repugnance -Other defect - Plea by wife (aged 19 years) of invincible repugnance or revulsion - Denial of frigidity, impotence or other defect - Curability of incapacity - Possibility of wife's consummating marriage - No physical impediment.
The Court found (1) That at the date of the ceremony of marriage between the petitioner and respondent the respondent was and still was capable of the act of generation; (2) That having regard to the finding at (1) above the question of the removal by art or skill of any incapacity on the part of the respondent did not arise; (3) That the respondent did not at the date of the ceremony of marriage and did not now suffer from such invincible repugnance or aversion to the petitioner as to render it impossible for her to consummate the marriage. Judgment was given dismissing the petition. The Court was of opinion that, although she was genuinely shocked and disgusted by attempts at consummation, and although she had a strong and real aversion towards the sexual act, the respondent did not make any genuine attempt to consummate her marriage...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.F. (Otherwise U.C.) v J.C.
...[1985] I.R. 733; [1986] I.L.R.M. 75. P.C. (orse O'B.) v. D.O'B. (Unreported, High Court, Carroll J., 2nd October, 1985). R.M. v. M.M. (1941) 76 I.L.T.R. 165. R.S.J. v. J.S.J. [1982] I.L.R.M. 263. R.T. v. V.P. (orse V.T.) [1990] 1 I.R. 545. S. v. S. (Unreported, Supreme Court, 1st July, 1976......
-
B(A) v B (E)
...ILRM 701 STATUS OF CHILDREN ACT 1987 NICOLAOU, STATE V AN BORD UCHTALA 1966 IR 567 D V C 1984 ILRM 173 C V C 1990 2 IR 91 M (CR) V M (M) 76 ILTR 165 B V D UNREP MURNAGHAN 20.6.73 K V K UNREP O'KEEFFE 16.2.71 MCK V MCC 1982 ILRM 277 COURTS (SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS) ACT 1961 CONSTITUTION ART ......
-
F (Orse C) v C
...P. - unreported - 30/7/1989 C. -v- C. - unreported - October 1989 Usher -v- Usher (1912) 2 I.R. N. -v- K. (1986) I.L.R.M. 75 M. -v- M. 76 I.L.T.R. 165 O'H. -v- F. (1986) I.L.R.M. 489 M (G) -v- M. - unreported McMahon, J. (1) 1986 I.L.R.M. 75 at 94 (2) Supreme Court - unreported - 1st July 1......
-
F (U) Orse C (U) v C (J)
..."a strong and real aversion to the sexual act" was considered as insufficient of itself to constitute "impotency" in law: see R.M. v.M.M. 76I.L.T.R. 165. Developments in psychiatric medicine might well make such an approach undesirable today. 45 It is in this context, I think, that Kenny J'......
-
'When Divorce is Away, Nullity's at Play': A New Ground for Annulment, its Dubious Past and its Uncertain Future
...to avoid. 20 See however, the dissenting decision ofKenny J. in S. v. S. [1976-7] ILRM 156. 21 McK. v. McK. [1936] IR 177 and R.M v. MM (1942) 76 ILTR 165. Although wilful refusal has been statutorily recognised as rendering a marriage voidable in England and Wales - see Matrimonial Causes ......