R (Montana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 November 2000 |
| Date | 23 November 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
CIS 2702 2000
...7(1)(b). He cited as examples of that practice R (on the application of Montana) v. The Secretary of State from the Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 552 at paragraph 14, Mamood v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 840, Isiko v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2......
-
AM, appeal by
...what else has to be proved. Tuckey LJ giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal in R (Montana) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 552, 559 [19] has explained that “the mere fact that citizenship is withheld cannot of itself be either a failure to respect or interference ......
-
AA, appeal by
...life as was explained by Tuckey LJ giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal in R (Montana) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 552, 559 at paragraph 37. In order to ascertain if on the facts of his case, AA’s claim is sufficiently serious to be able to pursue a claim for......
-
FM, appeal by
...without more, be a failure to respect or an interference with family life: R(Montana) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department[2001] 1 WLR 552 at [19]. 43. The appellant has a close knit family and regularly sees his extended family. He has indefinite leave to remain in the UK and is a......
Request a trial to view additional results